Hi Justin,
We are very thankful for your detailed analysis to help make Apache Hudi
release be compliant. We will work on your licensing comments and create a new
release candidate shortly. It would be immensely helpful for us if you can
point us to any other issues/feedback concerning this r
Hi -
Sorry, I found the email to the Board@a.o mailing list. I added the resolution
to the Board Agenda.
Best Regards,
Dave
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 9:52 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> No one has added the proposal to the Board agenda. Please do so ASAP. The
> Board meeting is next Wednes
Hi -
No one has added the proposal to the Board agenda. Please do so ASAP. The Board
meeting is next Wednesday and the Board wants some time to review the agenda.
If you require help then please ask.
Regards,
Dave (with my new Director hat)
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 9:46 AM, Moaz Reyad wrote:
>
Hi,
+1 (binding)
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
11 Eki 2019 Cum, saat 06:36 tarihinde Gosling Von
şunu yazdı:
> +1, binding
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Von Gosling
>
> > On Oct 10, 2019, at 4:54 PM, Ming wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After the discussion of APISIX proposal
> > (discussion thread:
> >
+1, binding
Best Regards,
Von Gosling
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 4:54 PM, Ming wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After the discussion of APISIX proposal
> (discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/aada574d5fe8e9cf246f213f3915aebb2afa710607676c2af5d5eb73@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E),
>
+1(binding)
Regards
Liang
Ming wrote
> Hi all,
>
> After the discussion of APISIX proposal
> (discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/aada574d5fe8e9cf246f213f3915aebb2afa710607676c2af5d5eb73@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E),
> I would like to call a VOTE to accept it into t
+1 (binding)
Best regards,
Ted Liu
2019 年 10 月 10 日周四 22:48，Dave Fisher 写道： +1 (binding)
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 1:54 AM, Ming wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After the discussion of APISIX proposal
> (discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html
Hi all,
The Apache MXNet (incubating) community is happy to announce Apache MXNet
(incubating) version 1.5.1!
Apache MXNet (incubating) is a deep learning framework designed for both
efficiency and flexibility. It allows you to mix symbolic and imperative
programming to maximize efficiency and pr
Hi,
> I don’t think this step is documented for new, graduated and retired podlings.
No it's not document anywhere, but it's on my list of things to do, we only
moved to the new wiki / LDAP authentication recently.
Thanks,
Justin
-
Hi Justin,
I don’t think this step is documented for new, graduated and retired podlings.
For example you still have zipkin in the list.
Regards,
Dave
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 4:18 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Yes, I saw that which is why I edited directly in the board whimsy. Sorry
>
Hi,
> Yes, I saw that which is why I edited directly in the board whimsy. Sorry
> for being late. ApacheCon and the board have been keeping me quite busy.
> : o) But I diid want to sync the incubator version up with my edits.
Not sure it needs to sync up. The reason I make the report page read
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hash fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE fine
- file has ASF header
- no unexpected binary files
- can compile from source
A number of file still have "Copyright 2015, Yahoo Inc.” I assume this needs to
be removed.
Tha
Hi,
Sorry but it’s -1 (binding) due to license issues
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signature and hash fine
- DISCLAIMER exist (but you might want to consider using the work in progress
disclaimer)
- LICENSE file is missing the appendix
- NOTICE is fine
- No unexpected binary file
- Source f
Dear IPMC,
The IPMC vote for releasing Superset 0.34.1 based on Superset 0.34.1rc2 has
concluded with the following votes:
3 binding +1 votes:
Alan Gates (+1 binding)
Kevin Ratnasekera (+1 binding)
Dave Fisher (+1 binding)
Kevin brought up the fact that "(incubating)" was missing from the NOTICE
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hash fine
- disclaimer exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- No binary files
- source files have correct headers
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-un
+1 (binding)
Incubating in name
Checksums and signatures checked
RAT Check passes once link is bypassed
LICENSE.txt checks
NOTICE checks
DISCLAIMER checks
Regards,
Dave
> On Oct 7, 2019, at 8:08 AM, Ville Brofeldt wrote:
>
> Dear IPMC,
>
> The Apache Superset community has voted on and approv
Dear IPMC,
Thank you Alan and Kevin for your votes; the minimum 72 h term is now up,
and we still need one more binding +1 vote to be able to release version
0.34.1 of Apache Superset (incubating). On behalf of the community that is
anxiously awaiting this bug-fix release, I plead to the remaining
+1 binding
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:31 PM vbal...@apache.org
wrote:
> Dear IPMC,
> Apache Hudi (incubating) (pronounced Hoodie) stands for Hadoop Upserts anD
> Incrementals. Apache Hudi (incubating) manages storage of large analytical
> datasets on DFS (Cloud stores, HDFS or any Hadoop FileSyst
Dear IPMC,
Apache Hudi (incubating) (pronounced Hoodie) stands for Hadoop Upserts anD
Incrementals. Apache Hudi (incubating) manages storage of large analytical
datasets on DFS (Cloud stores, HDFS or any Hadoop FileSystem compatible
storage) and provide ability to query them. Apache Hudi (incuba
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 1:54 AM, Ming wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After the discussion of APISIX proposal
> (discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/aada574d5fe8e9cf246f213f3915aebb2afa710607676c2af5d5eb73@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.o
Hi Justin,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:36 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> HI,
>
> > I just checked the Weex report for October, and while doing so, I
> realized
> > that I do not have edit rights to the incubator wiki.
>
> I think might what have happen here is that the page has been made read
> only as
HI,
> I just checked the Weex report for October, and while doing so, I realized
> that I do not have edit rights to the incubator wiki.
I think might what have happen here is that the page has been made read only as
the report has been submitted to the board. Note the "FINAL FINAL FINAL -
SU
Hi,
Myrle given you are on the incubator PMC I’m not sure why you couldn’t edit
that page.
Here is the list of groups who can currently edit that page, note that both
incubator-pmc and weex-pmc have permission to edit that page.
amaterasu-pmc
annotator-pmc
batchee-pmc
brpc-pmc
Hi,
Sorry but -1 form me.
The report section is open to podling PPMC members, each PPMC is added manually
and for one reason or another there may be a couple of podlings who have not
been added. They can just ask to be added. I don’t think we should open it up
to all committers.
On occasions
+1 (binding).
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:55 PM Ming wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After the discussion of APISIX proposal
> (discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/aada574d5fe8e9cf246f213f3915aebb2afa710607676c2af5d5eb73@%3Cgeneral.in
+1 ( binding )
I checked the following.
1. Incubating in name.
2. PGP Signature.
3. SHA512 Checksum.
4. DISCLAIMER-WIP exists.
5. LICENSE and NOTICE are fine.
6. No unexpected binary files.
7. maven build successful with tests.
Regards
Kevin
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 12:46 AM leerho wrote:
> Th
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Myrle Krantz wrote:
We should add the group "committers" with RW access (but not delete) to the
entire INCUBATOR space.
We have, historically, spent rather a lot of time granting people access to
our wiki.
Makes sense to me. We'd still need to grant permissions to people w
Generally/all: please stick to committers ... NOT confluence-users. The
latter will bring down the spam.
Thx,
Greg
InfraAdmin, ASF
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:40 AM Myrle Krantz wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I just checked the Weex report for October, and while doing so, I realized
> that I do not have
+1
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 4:44 PM York Shen wrote:
> +1
>
> Great idea. It could save everyone’s time in this mailing list, IMO.
>
> BTW, I just add RW access to all committers in Weex Wiki space.
>
> Best Regards,
> York Shen
>
> 申远
>
> > 2019年10月10日 17:40，Myrle Krantz 写道：
> >
> > Hey all,
>
+1
Great idea. It could save everyone’s time in this mailing list, IMO.
BTW, I just add RW access to all committers in Weex Wiki space.
Best Regards,
York Shen
申远
> 2019年10月10日 17:40，Myrle Krantz 写道：
>
> Hey all,
>
> I just checked the Weex report for October, and while doing so, I realized
+1 ( binding )
I checked the following.
1. Incubating in name.
2. PGP Signature.
3. SHA512 Checksum.
4. DISCLAIMER exists.
6. No unexpected binary files.
5. LICENSE and NOTICE are fine, except one question.
Shouldn't we need to include "(incubating)" project name in NOTICE file?
Regards
Kevin
Hey all,
I just checked the Weex report for October, and while doing so, I realized
that I do not have edit rights to the incubator wiki. Rather than request
them now, I'd like to make a different suggestion:
We should add the group "committers" with RW access (but not delete) to the
entire INCU
+1
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:25 PM Ming wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After the discussion of APISIX proposal
> (discussion thread:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/aada574d5fe8e9cf246f213f3915aebb2afa710607676c2af5d5eb73@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> ),
> I would like to call a VOTE to ac
Hi all,
After the discussion of APISIX proposal
(discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/aada574d5fe8e9cf246f213f3915aebb2afa710607676c2af5d5eb73@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E),
I would like to call a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator.
Please cast your vote:
[ ]
34 matches
Mail list logo
