Hi all,
After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing
Apache Mnemonic 0.8.0-incubating passed with 5 binding +1s, 5
non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1.
* Binding votes +1s: *
Uma Gangumalla (umamahesh)
Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
Patrick Hunt (phunt)
Josh Elser (elserj)
Justin M
It's grossly inaccurate to refer to Heron as a Storm fork. There are about
132k lines of code in the Heron codebase (plus 166k of codegen), of which
about 7k are to implement the Apache Storm API bindings to the Heron API.
The Rationale section of the proposal discusses the Heron architecture,
whi
update text as links, not sure why it was not links in email.
PPMC vote threads:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a298cdc88e7da94e88e3483342a8fc1e647061c9cc4c32aeb12f1ca9@%3Cdev.griffin.apache.org%3E
PPMC vote result threads:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f94c56da6d2b3f777898443a349634
Dear IPMC,
This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Griffin 0.1.4-incubating, release
candidate 2. This is the first release of Griffin.
Apache Griffin is data quality service for modern data system, it defines a
standard process to define, measure data quality for well-known dimensions.
Hi,
I will give +1(Non-binding), but,
I have the similar question about so many streaming framework in the apache,
how to develop community for themselves.
Best Regards,
Von Gosling
> 在 2017年6月23日，08:51，Edward Capriolo 写道：
>
> I believe heron and storm should be merged back together. I
All,
I'm requesting that the community holds on closing this vote for a few
extra days to address concerns raised by the Storm community and others.
Please don't interpret this as a -1, but do interpret it as a need for some
extra due dilligence due to code usage from Apache Storm within Heron.
I believe heron and storm should be merged back together. I do not see the
value of storm and a storm fork in the asf.
On Thursday, June 22, 2017, Bill Graham wrote:
> Thanks Taylor for relaying these sentiments, especially the part about the
> Heron website which is indeed poorly worded (I susp
Hi,
A late +1 (binding) from me
I checked:
- incubating in names
- signatures good
- LICENSE and NOTICE correct
- all files have ASF headers
- no expected binary files
- can compile from source
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe,
Thanks Taylor for relaying these sentiments, especially the part about the
Heron website which is indeed poorly worded (I suspect this could have been
the result of internal docs being open-sourced). I've opened this pull
request to update the language regarding Storm:
https://github.com/twitter/h
The Apache Storm PMC had a discussion regarding the Heron proposal. In the
spirit of openness I wanted to bring some of the sentiments expressed in that
discussion back to this list. Please note that I am paraphrasing from that
discussion and attempting to relay opinions of the collective PMC, n
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:15 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> Thanks John
> Comments inline, will ensure that your points are addressed before the
> first release candidate.
>
> -Jake
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 6:35 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
>> +1, however a few things to note a
The vote passed with 3 +1s and no -1s. Thanks Billie, John, and Josh
for looking at RC1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 5:35 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to start the process to move forward on a new incubator website.
> Based on discussions in the past on list, I wanted to do the following:
>
> - Roll out a new technology stack + repository
> - Leave content in place, while
+1 binding, originally on dev vote thread.
On June 22, 2017 at 9:34:50 AM, John D. Ament (johndam...@apache.org) wrote:
Copying my +1 from dev list.
John
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:44 AM James Bognar wrote:
> The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted +3 to release Apache Juneau
> 6.3.0-in
+1 binding (evaluated the release on the PPMC thread)
On 6/19/17 1:49 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
> Dear IPMC,
>
> Please vote for the following release candidate of Apache Fluo Recipes
> 1.1.0-incubating.
>
> PPMC vote threads:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4c99f51ef5302506f518d69
> 2ff9d65
Copying my +1 from dev list.
John
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:44 AM James Bognar wrote:
> The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted +3 to release Apache Juneau
> 6.3.0-incubating RC1. This vote carries over +1 binding vote from IPMC
> members.
>
> John D. Ament
>
> Incubator PMC members please r
The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted +3 to release Apache Juneau
6.3.0-incubating RC1. This vote carries over +1 binding vote from IPMC
members.
John D. Ament
Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incubator release.
Apache Juneau is...
- A toolkit for marshalling POJOs to
With 5 +1 binding and 1 +1 the vote to retire Blur has passed, in addition
to the 3 binding votes on the dev list. I'll begin the process in coming
days.
John
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 12:30 PM John D. Ament
wrote:
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote to retire the Blur podling. Blur has been
> in
18 matches
Mail list logo
