Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-14 Thread Julian Hyde
Jignesh, Your vote is binding on the dev list vote (because you are a member of Quickstep PPMC) but not binding on this incubator vote (because you are not a member of the Incubator PMC). Your vote is still welcome, but in future please mark it “(non-binding)”. Julian > On Mar 14, 2017, at 7:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-incubating-rc1

2017-03-14 Thread Sterling Hughes
+1 binding On 12 Mar 2017, at 21:09, marko kiiskila wrote: The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-incubating-rc1. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Apache Mynewt is a community-driven

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

2017-03-14 Thread Jignesh Patel
Forwarding my +1 (binding) from the dev list. On 3/10/17, 1:25 PM, "Jignesh Patel" wrote:     +1 (binding). On 3/8/17, 4:16 PM, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote:     This vote is for approval of the Quickstep-0.1.0 RC6.     Voters should download, unpack, build

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Fineract podling graduation

2017-03-14 Thread Myrle Krantz
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 1:57 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:34 AM Myrle Krantz wrote: > > > Hey Jon, > > > > Cool. So it'd be something like the text below. I have a question > > though. As initial members, I've included the initial members of the PMC > > rather than the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Fineract podling graduation

2017-03-14 Thread John D. Ament
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:34 AM Myrle Krantz wrote: > Hey Jon, > > Cool. So it'd be something like the text below. I have a question > though. As initial members, I've included the initial members of the PMC > rather than the full list of initial committers. Was that correct? > > Yes, that is

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Fineract podling graduation

2017-03-14 Thread Myrle Krantz
Hey Jon, Cool. So it'd be something like the text below. I have a question though. As initial members, I've included the initial members of the PMC rather than the full list of initial committers. Was that correct? Thanks again, Myrle (Quoted from the thread's initial e-mail) "Establish the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Fineract podling graduation

2017-03-14 Thread John D. Ament
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:18 AM John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:07 AM Myrle Krantz wrote: > > Hey Jon, > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:20 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > Understood. I think Fineract's ready to go. What I would recommend as > > next steps are to draft a propo

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Fineract podling graduation

2017-03-14 Thread John D. Ament
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:07 AM Myrle Krantz wrote: > Hey Jon, > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:20 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > Understood. I think Fineract's ready to go. What I would recommend as > > next steps are to draft a proposal in private and agree to that proposal. > > Then you ca

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Fineract podling graduation

2017-03-14 Thread Myrle Krantz
Hey Jon, On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:20 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Understood. I think Fineract's ready to go. What I would recommend as > next steps are to draft a proposal in private and agree to that proposal. > Then you can start the incubator vote. I'll point out this link to you as > we

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Fineract podling graduation

2017-03-14 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Myrle, On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > ...Here was the first time I sent the graduation proposal to the list: [1] .. ok, thanks for clarifying! Works for me. -Bertrand > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fdfa90dd11c90fee87e5e14ff9bfb4dc5b2f726e799d585154250c

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Fineract podling graduation

2017-03-14 Thread John D. Ament
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 6:05 AM Myrle Krantz wrote: > Hi Bertrand, > > Here was the first time I sent the graduation proposal to the list: [1] > > Roman asked that I send it out again as a DISCUSS thread, which I did in > the thread you referenced. We didn't get much response the second time, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Fineract podling graduation

2017-03-14 Thread Myrle Krantz
Hi Bertrand, Here was the first time I sent the graduation proposal to the list: [1] Roman asked that I send it out again as a DISCUSS thread, which I did in the thread you referenced. We didn't get much response the second time, because people had already responded to the first thread. I held

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution for Apache CarbonData graduation

2017-03-14 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Following Bertrand's comment, I updated resolution follow... Ah, so that was the wrong description - happy that I mentioned that ;-) Thanks for fixing! -Bertrand -

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Fineract podling graduation

2017-03-14 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Myrle, On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > ...The incubating Apache Fineract community believes it is time to graduate to > TLP... Did you guys have a vote about this? Quickly browsing your dev list I see only [1]. Formally you only need an Incubator PMC vote, but a projec

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution for Apache CarbonData graduation

2017-03-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Following Bertrand's comment, I updated resolution follow: X. Establish the Apache CarbonData Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charg

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution for Apache CarbonData graduation

2017-03-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Bertrand, my bad, I will update the section. Thanks ! Regards JB On 03/14/2017 04:42 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi JB, On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: ...creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposed resolution for Apache CarbonData graduation

2017-03-14 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi JB, On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > ...creation and maintenance of >open-source software, for distribution at no charge to >the public, related to a unified programming model for both >batch and streaming data processing, enabling efficient >exe