On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry but it’s -1 binding as the server artefact is missing a DISCLAIMER and
> NOTICE file.
>
Due to the issue noted above, this VOTE is canceled. We'll work to
address this in the next RC.
Thanks,
- Mike
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> ...
>
>> Is the issue with DISCLAIMER and NOTICE the only issue you've found which
>> blocks this release?
>
> Yep they would be the only things I consider blockers.
>
OK. Sounds good then.
Thanks for taking the time to review, Justin. I'l
Hi,
> Yes ... assuming we can legally strip out the GPL option of that license
> without violating said license. I'm wary of modifying/removing license
> terms of third-party software.
INAL but IMO yes it’s ok. This has come up on both legal discuss and this list
before. But if you’re concerned
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry but it’s -1 binding as the server artefact is missing a DISCLAIMER
> and NOTICE file.
>
>
Fair enough. Looks like we need to update EXTRA_DIST in the top-level
Makefile.am.
Also some files (for instance [1][2]]) contain the te
Hi,
Sorry but it’s -1 binding as the server artefact is missing a DISCLAIMER and
NOTICE file.
Also some files (for instance [1][2]]) contain the text of the GPL license. GPL
is Category X and is not allowed as a dependancy (unless it’s an optional
component or build tools like autoconf in the
+1 (binding) -C
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Jitendra Pandey
wrote:
> Dear All,
>I would like to call a vote for accepting "Ratis" for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator.
> The full proposal is available below, and is also available at this wiki link.
>https://wiki.apache.org/incub
Thanks.
Done.
Will send it shortly.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:46 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Ted, I'll leave it to you to submit when you're done.
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:30 PM Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> > I need to do some sign-offs.
> >
> > Otherwise looks good.
> >
> >
> >
> >
James
Would be happy to discuss that. Would also be happy to consider a
consolidated effort if it makes sense.
On Dec 17, 2016 15:02, "James Carman" wrote:
> I'll need to take a look to see how much this overlaps with what Microbule
> has to offer. Sounds interesting, though. Might make sens
I'll need to take a look to see how much this overlaps with what Microbule
has to offer. Sounds interesting, though. Might make sense to combine
efforts?
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 3:01 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> Upayavira,
>
>
>
> Updated! Thanks for taking a look.
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> On Fri,
Upayavira,
Updated! Thanks for taking a look.
John
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:37 PM Upayavira wrote:
> John,
>
> Can you update the proposal to include a definition of CDI for those of
> us that don't know what it means?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, at 03:03 AM, John D. A
Ted, I'll leave it to you to submit when you're done.
John
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:30 PM Ted Dunning wrote:
> I need to do some sign-offs.
>
> Otherwise looks good.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:47 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Please find the final draft below. Unless t
11 matches
Mail list logo
