Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread Feng Longda
Changing project's name is not a easy decision, especially it will destroy the compatibility, all of SDK package namespace will switch to a new one, A lot of the client applications need to be modified. Later, BonoLv will raise one thread to discuss changing the project's name. 2016-11-22 12:20 G

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread BonoLv
Thanks @John We have updated the proposal . The information of mentors section was rewritten using format learned from JuneauProposal. The two Github organization and multi-repository problem is caused by the following fact: At first we have followed the tradition of Alibaba open source community

[VOTE] Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.2-RC2

2016-11-21 Thread Kam Kasravi
Hi IPMC Community The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.2-RC2 has passed. We would like to now submit this release candidate to the IPMC. The PPMC vote thread is here: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2806964890bbcf4c8e5b0b871d5061e1e110b45435cd8135ebfa2964@%3Cdev.gearpump

RE: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread Edward J. Yoon
I personally felt that Weex is suggestive of "we ex-"., and thought not bad for UI/UX project. e.g., We experience, We experts, ... -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon -Original Message- From: Markus Geiß [mailto:markus.ge...@live.de] Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 11:04 PM To: general@in

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread Luke Han
In that case, I think a new project name will better for next step. Best Regards! - Luke Han On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote: > Given that wix.com gets by with the name, I'm not sure it > matters...there's probably more of a concern over confusion

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread Bruce Snyder
Thanks for providing the URL, John. My apologies for noting an incorrect number of binding votes. Below is an updated status. The vote passes with 38 +1 votes (10 binding) and no -1 votes. Below are the results: Jochen Wiedmann +1 (binding) Rob Davies +1 Bertrand Delacretaz +1 (binding) John D. A

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread John D. Ament
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:17 PM David Jencks wrote: > I didn’t vote here, but I rarely indicate my vote is binding although it > usually is. Checking here which votes are binding would have taken quite a > while…. perhaps in the future asking people to indicate if their vote is > binding would h

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread David Jencks
I didn’t vote here, but I rarely indicate my vote is binding although it usually is. Checking here which votes are binding would have taken quite a while…. perhaps in the future asking people to indicate if their vote is binding would help. thanks david jencks > On Nov 21, 2016, at 10:30 AM,

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread Bruce Snyder
Hi John, I relied on the binding count based on people stating that their vote is binding. Is this incorrect? Bruce On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:45 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Bruce > > Please double check your binding list. > > On Nov 21, 2016 12:24, "Bruce Snyder" wrote: > > > The vote passes

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread John D. Ament
Bruce Please double check your binding list. On Nov 21, 2016 12:24, "Bruce Snyder" wrote: > The vote passes with 38 +1 votes (5 binding) and no -1 votes. Below are the > results: > > Jochen Wiedmann +1 (binding) > Rob Davies +1 > Bertrand Delacretaz +1 > John D. Ament +1 > Myrle Krantz +1 > Deb

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread Bruce Snyder
The vote passes with 38 +1 votes (5 binding) and no -1 votes. Below are the results: Jochen Wiedmann +1 (binding) Rob Davies +1 Bertrand Delacretaz +1 John D. Ament +1 Myrle Krantz +1 Debo Dutta +1 Amol Kekre +1 Leif Hedstrom +1 P. Taylor Goetz +1 Stian Soiland-Reyes +1 Willem Jiang +1 (binding) J

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread Richard S. Hall
Given that wix.com gets by with the name, I'm not sure it matters...there's probably more of a concern over confusion with Wix than it referring to masturbation in German... :-) On 11/21/16 09:04 , Markus Geiß wrote: Hey ... I'm a native German speaker too ... The referenced word is pronounc

RE: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread Markus Geiß
Hey ... I'm a native German speaker too ... The referenced word is pronounced with a short 'i' and is referring to something a boy would do alone at night ... Given that Weex is pronounced with a long 'i', it could lead to some fun situations. Cheers Markus -Original Message- From: B

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > ...We'd like to start a discussion on accepting the Weex... A native German speaker tells me Weex means or sounds something between LOL and NSFW in German - if that's correct that's probably not a good name for an Apache project. -Bertran

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread John D. Ament
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:23 AM John D. Ament wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:08 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < > bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:31 AM, BonoLv wrote: > > ...Longda is very warmhearted in helping us to learn the Apache way. > We hope > > his applicatio

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread John D. Ament
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:08 AM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:31 AM, BonoLv wrote: > > ...Longda is very warmhearted in helping us to learn the Apache way. > We hope > > his application will be successful... > > Experienced Apache community members are welcome as infor

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:31 AM, BonoLv wrote: > ...Longda is very warmhearted in helping us to learn the Apache way. We hope > his application will be successful... Experienced Apache community members are welcome as informal mentors in any podling where their experience is relevant. They ju

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread BonoLv
The Weex proposal have modified to update the mentors section . Thanks @Bertrand Longda is very warmhearted in helping us to learn the Apache way. We hope his application will be successful. I'm Bono Lv from Weex team(one of initial developer) , Thanks all of you for interest in the project ;-

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread Feng Longda
@Niclas @Stephan Sorry for missing you in the mentors list. Later, we will add you two into the mentors list. I have added your two guys into proposal two month ago, but in the last several weeks, we have discussed a lot of things about proposal, this section has been overwrite. Sorry for that.

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Great, thanks for volunteering, Niclas! On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > I volunteer as mentor. I have been a bit inactive of the Weex proposal, but > my recent addition to the Incubator PMC was for this purpose. > > Cheers > Niclas > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Ber

Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
I volunteer as mentor. I have been a bit inactive of the Weex proposal, but my recent addition to the Incubator PMC was for this purpose. Cheers Niclas On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Edward J. Yoon > wrote: > > === Nomina