[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M2

2016-04-21 Thread Dan Smith
The vote passes with 3 binding +1 votes and no -1s: Roman Shaposhnik Justin Mclean Konstantin Boudnik Thanks for reviewing this release and voting! We'll move on to finalizing the release and announcing it. -Dan, on behalf of the Apache Geode (incubating) team On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:34 PM, K

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M2

2016-04-21 Thread Dan Smith
Thanks! I filed GEODE-1271 for the sha256 issues. -Dan On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > +1 [biding] > > Signature is good > sha256 is good > release tar content matches the commit > build works out of the source code > > Minor stuff on top of Justin's detailed analy

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M2

2016-04-21 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
+1 [biding] Signature is good sha256 is good release tar content matches the commit build works out of the source code Minor stuff on top of Justin's detailed analysis: - suffix for sha256 file is better be sha256, looks confusing otherwise - the file itself isn't properly formatted, which pr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M2

2016-04-21 Thread Dan Smith
Looks like we still need one more binding vote on this release. Could someone please take a look and vote? Thanks! -Dan On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC, > > This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release > 1.0.0-incubating.M2. > > Thi

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Apex Core 3.2.1-incubating released

2016-04-21 Thread Vlad Rozov
The Apache Apex community is pleased to announce release 3.2.1-incubating (Apex Core). Changes: https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/blob/v3.2.1-incubating/CHANGELOG.md Apache Apex is an enterprise grade native YARN big data-in-motion platform that unifies stream and batch processin

Re: Fwd: [jira] [Created] (HAWQ-694) 1844-313-4857 Quickbooks payroll support usa/canada

2016-04-21 Thread Gregory Chase
Cool and thanks! On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 21/04/2016 21:40, Gregory Chase wrote: > > Seems we have a JIRA user who's spamming Apache HAWQ? Is this a > compromised > > account, or someone who has access that shouldn't? > > It is a public Jira instance on which anyo

Re: Fwd: [jira] [Created] (HAWQ-694) 1844-313-4857 Quickbooks payroll support usa/canada

2016-04-21 Thread Mark Thomas
On 21/04/2016 21:40, Gregory Chase wrote: > Seems we have a JIRA user who's spamming Apache HAWQ? Is this a compromised > account, or someone who has access that shouldn't? It is a public Jira instance on which anyone can create an account. Sometimes spam happens. It is the cost of an open develop

Fwd: [jira] [Created] (HAWQ-694) 1844-313-4857 Quickbooks payroll support usa/canada

2016-04-21 Thread Gregory Chase
Seems we have a JIRA user who's spamming Apache HAWQ? Is this a compromised account, or someone who has access that shouldn't? -Greg -- Forwarded message -- From: Kalramin (JIRA) Date: Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:34 PM Subject: [jira] [Created] (HAWQ-694) 1844-313-4857 Quickbooks payro

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-21 Thread Edward Capriolo
@P. Taylor, Thanks for the detailed recap. As you mentioned we did contact those authors hoping to hear back. When I did the fork I did inform the original author: https://code.google.com/archive/p/java-gossip/issues/2 IIRC the owner this event with a like or a +1 (or whatever they provided), bu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-21 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
Here’s the fork history: gossip-protocol-java [1] —> gossip-java [2] —> Edwards github repo [3] Both [1] and [2] appear to be developed by a single person. With very little development (each has only two commits, by a single author, dating back to 2010). Both projects were also ASLv2 from the s

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-21 Thread John D. Ament
Sean, Could you provide a link to the discussion? John On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:41 AM Sean Busbey wrote: > This got discussed at length over the Metron proposal. We only need to > worry about an SGA from the original codebase authors if there is > still an active community. > > AFAICT, there

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-21 Thread Sean Busbey
This got discussed at length over the Metron proposal. We only need to worry about an SGA from the original codebase authors if there is still an active community. AFAICT, there is not. A notice to the original authors about what's happening with encouragement for them to show up if they're intere

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-21 Thread Edward Capriolo
That is a good plan to understand the code hand over. I mentioned this in another reply, but if this presents and issue I am more than happy to do a clean room implementation. There are a few reasons for this: Firstly, we want to make a spec so that other implementations in other languages can be

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gossip incubator proposal

2016-04-21 Thread John D. Ament
If you don't mind, I'll open a LEGAL ticket to check on the who of the SGA, if you haven't already. It'll be good to know for future discussions as well. John On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:56 AM Taylor Goetz wrote: > Lewis, please be patient. > > Edward and I are working on getting ICLAs signed, e