Copy my vote from eagle dev dl.
+1, check sum verified.
mvn clean install runs ok
mvn apache-rat:check looks good
liasu@eagle-c3-lvs01-2-3954:~/rc3$ md5sum
apache-eagle-0.3.0-incubating-src-rc3.tar.gz
a211a151d7f66c2516c5e41da1345128
apache-eagle-0.3.0-incubating-src-rc3.tar.gz
liasu@eagle-c3-l
+1
Thks,
Amol
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> +1.
>
> Alan.
>
> > On Mar 28, 2016, at 14:46, Pramod Immaneni
> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry missed including the resolution. Here is the full email again..
> >
> > The Apache Apex community has discussed and voted on graduation to t
+1 (Binding)
Best Regards,
Qingwen Zhao | 赵晴雯
2016-03-29 13:44 GMT+08:00 Henry Saputra :
> Sig file looks good
> Hash files look good
> NOTICE file exist
> LICENSE file exist
> DISCLAIMER file exist
> No 3rd party exe in source artifact
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Henry
>
>
>
> > > On Mar 28, 201
Sig file looks good
Hash files look good
NOTICE file exist
LICENSE file exist
DISCLAIMER file exist
No 3rd party exe in source artifact
+1 (binding)
- Henry
> > On Mar 28, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Dendukuri, Hemanth
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The Apache Eagle community has voted on and a
Forwarding my vote from dev:
+1 (binding)
- Hao
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Amareshwari Sriramdasu <
amareshw...@apache.org> wrote:
> Replaying my vote from dev list :
>
> +1 (Binding)
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Dendukuri, Hemanth
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> >The Apache
Replaying my vote from dev list :
+1 (Binding)
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Dendukuri, Hemanth
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>The Apache Eagle community has voted on and approved the proposal
> to release "Apache Eagle 0.3.0 Release Candidate 3 (incubating)".
>The voting result is avai
+1
Thanks,
David
On 2016-03-28 14:46, Pramod Immaneni wrote:
> Sorry missed including the resolution. Here is the full email again..>
>
> The Apache Apex community has discussed and voted on graduation to top>
> level project.>
> The vote passed with 42 1 votes (12 from the PPMC) and no 0 or -
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal
> and the feedback so far seems to be positive.
>
> Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator.
Forwarding my vote from dev:
+1 (binding)
Julian
> On Mar 28, 2016, at 5:05 PM, Dendukuri, Hemanth wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache Eagle community has voted on and approved the proposal to
> release "Apache Eagle 0.3.0 Release Candidate 3 (incubating)".
> The voting result is a
Hi all,
The Apache Eagle community has voted on and approved the proposal to
release "Apache Eagle 0.3.0 Release Candidate 3 (incubating)".
The voting result is available at https://s.apache.org/eagle-0.3.0-result
The Source file to be voted are located here:
https://dist.
+1.
Alan.
> On Mar 28, 2016, at 14:46, Pramod Immaneni wrote:
>
> Sorry missed including the resolution. Here is the full email again..
>
> The Apache Apex community has discussed and voted on graduation to top
> level project.
> The vote passed with 42 +1 votes (12 from the PPMC) and no 0 or
+1
Thanks,
Thomas
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Pramod Immaneni
wrote:
> Sorry missed including the resolution. Here is the full email again..
>
> The Apache Apex community has discussed and voted on graduation to top
> level project.
> The vote passed with 42 +1 votes (12 from the PPMC) and
Sorry missed including the resolution. Here is the full email again..
The Apache Apex community has discussed and voted on graduation to top
level project.
The vote passed with 42 +1 votes (12 from the PPMC) and no 0 or -1 votes.
Maturity Assessment:http://apex.incubator.apache.org/maturity.html
There hasn't been a discussion thread here on the general list, but I am
still prepared to vote in favor of this.
+1
See!
I just did.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Pramod Immaneni wrote:
> The Apache Apex community has discussed and voted on graduation to top
> level project.
> The vote
The Apache Apex community has discussed and voted on graduation to top
level project.
The vote passed with 42 +1 votes (12 from the PPMC) and no 0 or -1 votes.
Maturity Assessment:
http://apex.incubator.apache.org/maturity.html
Discussion:
https://s.apache.org/qrvY
Vote:
https://s.apache.org/R8MR
+1 (binding)
> On Mar 28, 2016, at 11:50 AM, Rahul Iyer wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>
>
>>> Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator.
>>> The vote will be open until Mon 3/28 noon PST.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator
>>> [ ] +0 Abstain
>>> [ ]
+1 (non-binding)
> > Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator.
> > The vote will be open until Mon 3/28 noon PST.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator
> > [ ] +0 Abstain
> > [ ] -1 Don't accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator because ...
>
>
>
>
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:44 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> We're currently at 54 podlings in the incubator. I feel like that's a
> lot. Anyone else have any concerns with so many podlings?
I really encourage everybody to read the feedback on the last year's attempt
at changing the Incubat
Since I came to OpenOffice and Apache via my work on ODF at OASIS, I have some
interest in this topic.
I share Sam Ruby's bafflement. Sustainability of a single committer curating
the code base is certainly a concern. In November 2015, mentor Nick Burch
challenged the podling with the threa
With 11 binding +1s (Chris Nauroth, James Taylor, Flavio Junqueira,
Julian Hyde, Chris Douglas, Amol Kekre, Josh Elser, Andrew Purtell, P.
Taylor Goetz, Suresh Marru and Daniel Dai), the vote passes. Thanks
everyone for taking time to vote. I will proceed with next steps.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Fri, M
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal
> and the feedback so far seems to be positive.
>
> Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator.
+1 [binding]
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 02:01PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal
> and the feedback so far seems to be positive.
>
> Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Ap
There was also some discussion of maybe bringing the code into Apache
Tika - we would be happy to have a discussion on dev@tika if it made
sense RE: ODF Toolkit.
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Harbs wrote:
> What about recommending that it be adopted by OpenOffice?
>
> IIUC, ODF Toolkit predates OpenOffice becoming an Apache Project. It seems
> (to an outsider like me) like the OpenOffice community would be a good home
> for a related toolkit.
It was
What about recommending that it be adopted by OpenOffice?
IIUC, ODF Toolkit predates OpenOffice becoming an Apache Project. It seems (to
an outsider like me) like the OpenOffice community would be a good home for a
related toolkit.
Harbs
On Mar 28, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Mon,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:36 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:33 AM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:44 AM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>> > Both great ideas. Thanksfully, Whimsy helps a bit on the age part
>> >
>> > https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/podlings/by-
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:33 AM Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:44 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > Both great ideas. Thanksfully, Whimsy helps a bit on the age part
> >
> > https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/podlings/by-age
> >
> > It also gives a clean dashboard to display who the
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> We're currently at 54 podlings in the incubator.
>
> A more use stat would perhaps to see:
> a) How long they have been in incubation?
> b) How many releases have they made?
>
> May be easier to then target one that should graduate o
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:44 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Both great ideas. Thanksfully, Whimsy helps a bit on the age part
>
> https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/podlings/by-age
>
> It also gives a clean dashboard to display who the mentors are, etc. Is it
> possible we can have the mentors of e
Both great ideas. Thanksfully, Whimsy helps a bit on the age part
https://whimsy.apache.org/incubator/podlings/by-age
It also gives a clean dashboard to display who the mentors are, etc. Is it
possible we can have the mentors of each project give this feedback in an
objective manner?
John
On
> Am 28.03.2016 um 07:59 schrieb Jean-Baptiste
Add
> Onofré :
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree with Justin.
>
> Maybe, we should do kind of audit:
> - are the podlings actually active (commits, messages on the mailing list,
> releases, etc) ?
> - for how long are they in the incubator ?
> - how far are th
31 matches
Mail list logo
