Re: Advice on binary NOTICE

Hi, > * The PMC is spared from performing analysis of dependency NOTICE content. > * Verbatim aggregation can be achieved programmatically, allowing for >automated solutions. It simple I like that. However there's probably no TLP or incubator project (with bundled Apache licensed code)

Re: Allowed Champions on podlings

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > In the meantime, I don't think the present rule offers enough value to > justify > its complexity. > +1

Re: Allowed Champions on podlings

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Tim Williams wrote: > Without judging the goodness of it... I'd just point out that > currently in the non-Member Officer case, they must be a member of the > Sponsoring PMC. I thought that was true of Members as well, btw, but > thought I'd point out that it's n

RE: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

Hi, Yes, very true, Pierre. Back in the summer of 2014, a proposal to implement a generic transaction API was submitted as HBASE-11447 to allow support for multiple implementations of transaction monitors. Some discussions were held at the time, but a final decision on the API has not been made.

Re: Advice on binary NOTICE

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > I suspect 'relevant' means those parts of a NOTICE relating to the parts > of > > the product you use. > > Yes, that was the intent. That sentence references section 4d of the A

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

Hi Henry, It seems you (and several others) are forgetting the Trafodion, which also privides transactions on N*SQL solutions, see http trafodion.apache.org Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.of

Re: Advice on binary NOTICE

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > I suspect 'relevant' means those parts of a NOTICE relating to the parts of > the product you use. Yes, that was the intent. That sentence references section 4d of the ALv2, specifically this phrase: excluding those notices that do not

Re: Update on Apache Toree and LGPL dependency

Brilliant :) On Thursday, March 17, 2016, Chip Senkbeil wrote: > Just wanted to give a status update with this one. JeroMQ is down to just > four contributors that have not responded. The current, active committers > for JeroMQ have reverted the commits for one of the contributors here: > > http

Re: Advice on binary NOTICE

I suspect 'relevant' means those parts of a NOTICE relating to the parts of the product you use. In this case you'd include the whole file (ie +1 to Marvin). I suspect 'relevant' needs clarification in the docs. Hen On Friday, March 18, 2016, Stephen Mallette wrote: > The Jackson JSON proce

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

That seems be a good approach for Apache Phoenix to enable possible different transaction engine. - Henry On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Apache Phoenix just released version 4.7.0 with big news: transactions > support, using Tephra. There's some interest in a successfu

[DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

Hi, I would like to propose Omid as an Apache Incubator project: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OmidProposal I've posted posted the text of the proposal below: Thanks, Daniel = Omid Proposal = === Abstract === Omid is a flexible, reliable, high performant and scalable ACID transactional f

Re: Request for Administrator Wiki Access: ChrisNauroth

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > Can I please be added to the incubator wiki Administrators group? My wiki > login is ChrisNauroth. I would like administrator access so that I can > field requests from contributors to get edit access on incubator proposals. Done. Marvin

Re: Request for Wiki Edit Access: SiddharthAnand

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Siddharth Anand wrote: > Can I please be added to the incubator wiki Contributors group? My wiki > login is SiddharthAnand. I would like to edit my Airflow Incubator > Proposal (https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AirflowProposal) in response to > feedback. Done.

RE: [MARKETING] [Caution: Suspicious URL]: Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

Andrew, Do you think Cloudera will include this new version in their bundle same as Horton ? Dor -Original Message- From: Andrew Purtell [mailto:andrew.purt...@gmail.com] Sent: שבת 19 מרץ 2016 22:59 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [MARKETING] [Caution: Suspicious URL]: Re: