Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

2016-03-18 Thread Stack
+1 (binding) Good luck lads, St.Ack On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Daniel Dai wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose Omid as an Apache Incubator project: > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OmidProposal > > I've posted posted the text of the proposal below: > > Thanks, > Daniel > > = Omid

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

2016-03-18 Thread Henry Saputra
I know Apache incubator does not play favorite but it is getting awkward that TWO transaction engine for HBase coming to incubator at the same time. As most people know, the other one is Tephra, that just coming to incubator few weeks ago. As member of IPMC, I would like to see Omid provide some

daijy for incubator wiki access

2016-03-18 Thread Daniel Dai
Please add daijy to incubator contributors group so I can edit wiki. Thanks, Daniel

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-18 Thread Stack
I'm late, but let me add my +1 anyways. St.Ack On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Poorna Chandra wrote: > Hi All, > > Tephra proposal was sent out for discussion last week. The proposal is > available at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TephraProposal > > Please vote to accept Tephra into the Apac

Re: Advice on binary NOTICE

2016-03-18 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:57:42 -0400 Stephen Mallette wrote: > "If the dependency supplies a NOTICE file, its contents must be > analyzed and the relevant portions bubbled up into the top-level > NOTICE file." With a NOTICE that length, why not include it complete? The main thing I'd consider is r

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Omid for Apache Incubator

2016-03-18 Thread Greg Trasuk
I don’t think it’s the Incubator’s job to choose which competing projects should join the foundation. All we’re here to do is to make sure that a community knows how to act like an Apache community, and that the artifacts are licensed properly. It’s probably worth pointing out to both projects