On 1/22/16, 10:58 AM, "Frances Perry" wrote:
>Crunch started as a clone of FlumeJava, which was Google internal. In the
>meantime inside Google, FlumeJava evolved into Dataflow. So all three
>share
>a number of concepts like PCollections, ParDo, DoFn, etc. However,
>Dataflow
>adds a number of n
Friday, January 22, 2016, 6:29:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Maybe it's too late or has been already reported but at 1st glance
> it was not obvious to me that, after downloading/installing Ant and Ivy, I
> should
> have copied ivy.jar in ant/lib to be able to build.
>
> Else you get this error
Thanks Frances ! That explains it.
Wrote a couple of posts on basic usage of Crunch, may be its time to
rewrite them with Dataflow.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Frances Perry wrote:
> Crunch started as a clone of FlumeJava, which was Google internal. In the
> meantime inside Google, FlumeJa
Silly me - send this email too early. I see the vote is closed already. Sorry
for the noise.
Cos
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:43AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Thanks Alex!
>
> BTW, the vote has been open for the whole week now, and it seems that you have
> enough binding votes to make it happen.
Crunch started as a clone of FlumeJava, which was Google internal. In the
meantime inside Google, FlumeJava evolved into Dataflow. So all three share
a number of concepts like PCollections, ParDo, DoFn, etc. However, Dataflow
adds a number of new things -- the biggest being a unified batch/streamin
Friday, January 22, 2016, 9:13:15 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> There are unexpected jars in source release but this will be fixed in a later
> release. [1]
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in release name
> - disclaimer exists
> - license and notice correct
> - unexpected binary
Thanks Alex!
BTW, the vote has been open for the whole week now, and it seems that you have
enough binding votes to make it happen. Perhaps, this is time to close and
publish the release? There are people waiting for it, you know ;)
Cos
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 04:34PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote:
Crunch has Spark pipelines, but not sure about the runner abstraction.
May be Josh Wills or Tom White can provide more insight on this topic.
They are core devs for both projects :)
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know deeply Crunch, but AFAIK, Crun
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Felix Cheung wrote:
> FelixCheung
>
> Permission to edit please
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-
FelixCheung
Permission to edit please
Hi,
I don't know deeply Crunch, but AFAIK, Crunch creates MapReduce
pipeline, it doesn't provide runner abstraction. It's based on FlumeJava.
The logic is very similar (with DoFns, pipelines, ...). Correct me if
I'm wrong, but Crunch started after Google Dataflow, especially because
Dataflow
Maybe it's too late or has been already reported but at 1st glance it was not obvious to me that, after downloading/installing Ant and Ivy, I should
have copied ivy.jar in ant/lib to be able to build.
Else you get this error:
<>
So for noobies like me, I would recommend a sentence like
<>
af
Hi JB,
Curious to know about how it compares to Apache Crunch? Constructs
looks very familiar (had used Crunch long ago)
Thoughts?
- Ashish
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Seshu,
>
> I blogged about Apache Dataflow proposal:
> http://blog.nanthrax.net/2016/01/
As a committer of another "dataflow" incubator Taverna, I think this
looks like an exciting proposal.
Agree on the confusion of the name, and it's probably better to get
that sorted early.
In Taverna we have used the term "dataflow" since 2004, and as a
concept the paradigm was created in the 19
On 1/21/16, 11:52 PM, "Daniel Dekany" wrote:
>Friday, January 22, 2016, 1:08:36 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
>> If may be (but unlikely IMO) that this applies [1]. Best to ask on
>> legal discuss to confirm.
>
>I have red the related ASF documents back then, and I don't understand
>how can this l
Awesome to see CloudDataFlow coming to Apache. The Stream Processing area
has been in general fragmented with a variety of solutions, hoping the
community galvanizes around Apache Data Flow.
We are still in the "Apache Storm" world, Any chance for folks building a
"Storm Runner²?
On 1/20/16, 9:
+1 (binding)
quickly checked legal files (disclainer, license and notice) and build
from source without problem.
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 08:26 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incu
Hi Seshu,
I blogged about Apache Dataflow proposal:
http://blog.nanthrax.net/2016/01/introducing-apache-dataflow/
You can see in the "what's next ?" section that new runners, skins and
sources are on our roadmap. Definitely, a storm runner could be part of
this.
Regards
JB
On 01/22/2016 0
Hi,
> Justin, Podling has decided to keep their old method having RCs out for a
> while for integration testing.
It’s only a suggestion. It’s totally up to the PMC how they name their release
candidates.
> That's was the source I vote -1,because FMPOV that was not properly handled
> in the pro
Hi Supun,
I added you on the proposal.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/22/2016 12:37 AM, Supun Kamburugamuve wrote:
We are developing parallel machine learning algorithms for a research
project and are very interested in DataFlow. I would like to contribute to
this project as well. It will be great
Hi Tsuyoshi
Awesome: I added you on the proposal.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/22/2016 04:29 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
Hi, I'm a core developer of Apache Hadoop and a contributor of Apache Tez.
I'd be also interested in working on Apache Dataflow as an individual.
Regards,
- Tsuyoshi
-Origi
Hi Mayank,
sure: you are in.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/22/2016 12:29 AM, Mayank Bansal wrote:
Hi Jean,
Nice Proposal.
I wanted to contribute to this project. Can you please add me too?
Thanks a lot for the help
Thanks,
Mayank
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré mailto:j.
It makes perfect sense, and it's something that we already discussed.
Thanks James and Marvin.
@James, yes, we are going to deal with that together, not a problem at
all. I agree that renaming should happen now.
As discussed, we should be back with a new name early next week.
I'm happy to see
Once I had time to check this new attempt, I vote +1 (binding) to
release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
>
> I'd also suggest that you name each release candidate in order e.g rc1,
> rc2, rc3 etc etc rather than naming them all rc1. There's l
Hi,
+1 binding
There are unexpected jars in source release but this will be fixed in a later
release. [1]
I checked:
- incubating in release name
- disclaimer exists
- license and notice correct
- unexpected binary files in source release (jars)
- all source files have Apache headers
- can comp
Hi,
> Now there is (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-15).
Thanks for that.
> I have red the related ASF documents back then, and I don't understand
> how can this lead to any legal problem since:
> - These binaries were contributed directly to the project
> - Their origin is clar
26 matches
Mail list logo