RE: How to get more mentors on podlings

I see this as the Champions role. You could ask for volunteers, and it will get you folks but you really want people who are invested. As a champion I consider it my job to fund such folks. Sent from my Windows Phone From: John D. Ament

Re: How to get more mentors on podlings

On Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 01:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Based on some the threads floating around I ask this of all. > > How should a podling reach out when they need more active mentors? I am > not saying there needs to be a big process or a small one, but at least > some guidance to give to

Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML Incubator Proposal

Hi Luciano, If you need any additional mentors, let me know. I would be interested in helping out. thanks — Hitesh On Oct 23, 2015, at 4:34 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > We would like to start a discussion on accepting SystemML as an Apache > Incubator project. > > The proposal is availab

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an > incubation project. > > The vote is open for 72 hours: > > [ ] +1 accept Eagle in t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 Shaofeng Shi 于2015年10月24日周六 08:40写道： > +1 (non-binding) > > "Manoharan, Arun" 编写： > > >Hello Everyone, > > > >Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > > > >I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an > incubation project. > > > >The vote is open for 72 hours: >

How to get more mentors on podlings

Based on some the threads floating around I ask this of all. How should a podling reach out when they need more active mentors? I am not saying there needs to be a big process or a small one, but at least some guidance to give to poslongs when they need a boost. It seems to me that sometimes we

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (non-binding) "Manoharan, Arun" 编写： >Hello Everyone, > >Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > >I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an incubation >project. > >The vote is open for 72 hours: > >[ ] +1 accept Eagle in the Incubator >[ ] ±0 >[ ] -1 (please

Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML Incubator Proposal

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi Luciano, > > Good proposal, but looks like > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SystemM does not exist? > Good catch, it's a typo on the original link and it's missing the L at the end, here is the correct link https://wiki.apache.org/in

Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML Incubator Proposal

Hi Luciano, Good proposal, but looks like https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SystemM does not exist? Also, Reynold Xin and Patrick Wendell are not member of IPMCs so I don't they could be mentors of this project, yet. They can ask to be member of IPMCs since both are already member of ASF. But fo

[DISCUSS] SystemML Incubator Proposal

We would like to start a discussion on accepting SystemML as an Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available at : https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SystemM And it's contents is also copied below. Thanks in Advance for you time reviewing and providing feedback. == = SystemML

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 -Medha On 10/23/15, 1:14 PM, "Balaji Ganesan" wrote: >+1 > >On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Chris Nauroth >wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> --Chris Nauroth >> >> >> >> >> On 10/23/15, 7:11 AM, "Manoharan, Arun" wrote: >> >> >Hello Everyone, >> > >> >Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > +1 (binding) > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 10/23/15, 7:11 AM, "Manoharan, Arun" wrote: > > >Hello Everyone, > > > >Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > > > >I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 10/23/15, 7:11 AM, "Manoharan, Arun" wrote: >Hello Everyone, > >Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > >I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an >incubation project. > >The vote is open for 72 hours: > >[ ] +1 accept Eagle

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) > On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:13 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > +1 > On Oct 23, 2015 10:11, "Manoharan, Arun" wrote: > >> Hello Everyone, >> >> Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. >> >> I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an >> incubation projec

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 On Oct 23, 2015 10:11, "Manoharan, Arun" wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an > incubation project. > > The vote is open for 72 hours: > > [ ] +1 accept Eagle in the Incubator > [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (non binding) On 10/23/15, 9:52 AM, "Hitesh Shah" wrote: >+1 (binding) > >‹ Hitesh > >On Oct 23, 2015, at 7:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun wrote: > >> Hello Everyone, >> >> Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. >> >> I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an >>i

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) — Hitesh On Oct 23, 2015, at 7:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an incubation > project. > > The vote is open for 72 hours: > > [ ] +1 accept

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Manoharan, Arun wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an > incubation project. > > The vote is open for 72 hours: > > [ ] +1 accept Eagle

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an > incubation project. > > The vote is open for 72 hours: > > [ ] +1 accept Eagle in

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (non-binding) 2015-10-23 23:50 GMT+08:00 Owen O'Malley : > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:42 AM, wp chun wrote: > > > +1 > > wp_c...@hotmail.com > > > > > > On 10/23/15, 11:26 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote: > > > > > > >+1 (binding) > > > > > > > >-Taylor > > > > > > > >> On Oct 23

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:42 AM, wp chun wrote: > +1 > wp_c...@hotmail.com > > > > On 10/23/15, 11:26 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote: > > > > >+1 (binding) > > > > > >-Taylor > > > > > >> On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun > > >>wrote: > > >> > > >> Hello Everyone, > > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Thanks Justin, we will also double check and update any other stuff in further releases. Thanks again. Luke Best Regards! - Luke Han On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Would you mind to change your vote to release this candidate? > > You can

RE: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 wp_c...@hotmail.com > > On 10/23/15, 11:26 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote: > > >+1 (binding) > > > >-Taylor > > > >> On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun > >>wrote: > >> > >> Hello Everyone, > >> > >> Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > >> > >> I would like to call

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (non-binding) Best Regards! - Luke Han On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:26 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -Taylor > > > On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun > wrote: > > > > Hello Everyone, > > > > Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an incubation > project. > > The vote is open for 72 hours: > > [ ] +1 ac

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

This vote passes with 4 binding +1s and 6 no-binding +1s, no 0 or -1 votes: +1 Julian Hyde (binding) +1 Henry Saputra (binding) +1 Taylor Goetz (binding) +1 Justin Mclean (binding) +1 Luke Han +1 Li Yang +1 Hongbin Ma +1 Qiaohao Zhou +1 Samant, Medha +1 Shaofeng Shi Thanks everyone. We’ll now rol

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an incubation > project. > > The vote is open for 72 hours: > > [ ] +1 accept Eagle in t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Thanks Justin and everyone! I will send out the vote result soon; 2015-10-23 13:38 GMT+08:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > > > Would you mind to change your vote to release this candidate? > > You can release it without me changing my vote, there are no veto on > releases. > > But as you asked and it's

Re: [VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Manoharan, Arun wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an > incubation project. > > The vote is open for 72 hours: > > [ ] +1 accept Eagle

[VOTE] Accept Eagle into Apache Incubation

Hello Everyone, Thanks for all the feedback on the Eagle Proposal. I would like to call for a [VOTE] on Eagle joining the ASF as an incubation project. The vote is open for 72 hours: [ ] +1 accept Eagle in the Incubator [ ] ±0 [ ] -1 (please give reason) Eagle is a Monitoring solution for Had

Re: Not just yet

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:09 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:07 AM Greg Stein wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >... >> >> > I'm a bit bothered by the fact that this would mean that the community >> > voted on one resolution and then a different

Re: Not just yet

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:07 AM Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > >... > > > I'm a bit bothered by the fact that this would mean that the community > > voted on one resolution and then a different resolution is constructed > > anew for the board to approve.

Re: Short form IP clearance

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:03 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:55 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > So basically if someone attaches a patch to a JIRA, which becomes > part > > of our public mailing lists, we're good? > > If that code was all that poster's original work, not previo

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.0.2-incubating Release

Hello, We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.0.2-incubating is ready for release. The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tinkerpop/3.0.2-incubating/ The source distribution is provided by: apache-tinkerpop-3.0.2-incubating

Re: Not just yet

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >... > I'm a bit bothered by the fact that this would mean that the community > voted on one resolution and then a different resolution is constructed > anew for the board to approve. But at the moment, I'm not sure how to > solve that problem. >

Re: Short form IP clearance

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:55 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > So basically if someone attaches a patch to a JIRA, which becomes part > of our public mailing lists, we're good? If that code was all that poster's original work, not previously published elsewhere (particularly under a different licens

Re: Short form IP clearance

So basically if someone attaches a patch to a JIRA, which becomes part of our public mailing lists, we're good? Would github PR's fall under the same premise, since the contents of those mails become public record? On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:51 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:

Re: Short form IP clearance

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:41 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I think probably the better question is "which contributions require IP > Clearance"? "Any code that was developed outside of the ASF SVN repository and our public mailing lists must be processed like this, even if the external developer is

Re: Short form IP clearance

I think probably the better question is "which contributions require IP Clearance"? On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:19 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > On Oct 22, 2015, at 7:13 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > > > Again my apologies for polluting this thread with tangential thoughts. > > > > Maybe I shoul

Re: Short form IP clearance

> On Oct 22, 2015, at 7:13 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > > Again my apologies for polluting this thread with tangential thoughts. > > Maybe I should start a new thread: "Is IP Clearance Optional?" > That would be a short one. My response would be No. :) --

Re: Not just yet

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Oct 23, 2015 1:01 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >> > On Oct 22, 2015 9:57 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote: >> >>... >> >> I've also opened another issue that I would appreciate feedback on: >> >> >> >