Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

2015-10-18 Thread hongbin ma
+1 unit test passed on my CI On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Li Yang wrote: > +1 > > Checksum is correct. > > Unit test passed on java version "1.7.0_71", OpenJDK Runtime Environment > (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-x86_64 u71-b14) > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Luke Han wrote: > > > +1 > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

2015-10-18 Thread Li Yang
+1 Checksum is correct. Unit test passed on java version "1.7.0_71", OpenJDK Runtime Environment (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-x86_64 u71-b14) On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Luke Han wrote: > +1 > > MD5 & SHA1 checksum verified > License files are all there > > Unit Test passed > > > > Best Regards! >

Re: 回复: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

2015-10-18 Thread Edward J. Yoon
+1 (binding) On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Li Yang wrote: > +1 :-) > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Saha, Debashis wrote: > >> +1 >> >> -Original Message- >> From: 蒋旭 [mailto:jiangxu.ch...@qq.com] >> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 1:23 AM >> To: general >> Subject: 回复: [VOTE] Gr

Re: 回复: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

2015-10-18 Thread Li Yang
+1 :-) On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Saha, Debashis wrote: > +1 > > -Original Message- > From: 蒋旭 [mailto:jiangxu.ch...@qq.com] > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 1:23 AM > To: general > Subject: 回复: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator > > +1 > Jiang Xu > ---

Re: [graduation] Maturity model-based assessment of Groovy for its graduation

2015-10-18 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 18/10/15 10:48, Martijn Dashorst a écrit : > -1 on requiring all projects to do this exercise. It is not policy, > and frankly as a volunteer organization we can let the communities > themselves determine whether this is something they want to spend > their time on. Well, I unerstand your conce

Re: [graduation] Maturity model-based assessment of Groovy for its graduation

2015-10-18 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Just looked over Bertrand's document and I must say while I had high > expectations Bertrand has managed to surpass them. That this is a > functional and itemized list of details is just perfect- even better that > there are citations and ref

Re: [graduation] Maturity model-based assessment of Groovy for its graduation

2015-10-18 Thread Martijn Dashorst
-1 on requiring all projects to do this exercise. It is not policy, and frankly as a volunteer organization we can let the communities themselves determine whether this is something they want to spend their time on. I thought we were a community for/over code, not a bureaucracy for/over code. If/