Hi,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> ...you should not worry too much about having the project to be in
> incubator forever...
That's assuming the community grows.
https://github.com/easymock/easymock/graphs/contributors shows a huge
majority of commits by Henri with just
Carry-over from the htrace dev list, +1 (binding)
St.Ack
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Colin P. McCabe wrote:
> Apache HTrace (incubating), has voted to release the below referenced
> Apache HTrace 4.0.1-incubating release candidate.
>
> Dear IPMC, please vote on our second release candidate
Apache HTrace (incubating), has voted to release the below referenced
Apache HTrace 4.0.1-incubating release candidate.
Dear IPMC, please vote on our second release candidate as an Apache
Incubator project.
The source tarball, hashes, and signing are here:
http://people.apache.org/~cmccabe/htrace
Hi Henri,
Thanks for the interest for moving EasyMock to be in Apache incubator.
All projects coming in incubator should not stay longer than it needs to be.
The main purpose of a project to be in incubator is to help new people
coming to Apache to learn to develop in the Apache Way [1].
This inc
Oh, I see, thank you for the correction Ate. I wasn't aware that the
votes from IPMC members on the dev@ vote counted in the general@ vote
without being recast explicitly.
I'll be sure to add those votes to the tally next time around.
-Ian
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On
Got it! Thx.
On 9/22/15 11:11 AM, Ian Maxon wrote:
First let me just preface by saying this is just how I understand
it... If I am wrong anyone please feel free to chime in.
There are indeed two votes, one is the vote on dev@asterixdb.a.i.o
where the folks we need to vote (the binding votes) ar
On 2015-09-22 20:11, Ian Maxon wrote:
First let me just preface by saying this is just how I understand
it... If I am wrong anyone please feel free to chime in.
There are indeed two votes, one is the vote on dev@asterixdb.a.i.o
where the folks we need to vote (the binding votes) are the Podling
P
First let me just preface by saying this is just how I understand
it... If I am wrong anyone please feel free to chime in.
There are indeed two votes, one is the vote on dev@asterixdb.a.i.o
where the folks we need to vote (the binding votes) are the Podling
Project Management Committee (PPMC) membe
Same Q here - did we need to vote on a different list too?
On Sep 22, 2015 8:55 AM, "Chen Li" wrote:
> Ian,
>
> I already did my "+1". Do I have to say "Binding" in order to include
> it? Still not quite clear about the protocol.
>
> Chen
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Ian Maxon wrote:
Ian,
I already did my "+1". Do I have to say "Binding" in order to include
it? Still not quite clear about the protocol.
Chen
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Ian Maxon wrote:
> The vote for releasing Apache AsterixDB Hyracks 0.2.16-incubating
> passed with 3 binding +1s, 0
> non-binding +1s
Hi,
I'm the current lead developer and are mostly maintaining all of EasyMock,
the venerable mocking framework.
I'm thinking about moving it to Apache. My main interest is to find a new
community for it. However, I don't want it to stay in the incubator
forever. So I won't move to Apache if I don
The vote for releasing Apache AsterixDB Hyracks 0.2.16-incubating
passed with 3 binding +1s, 0
non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1 votes.
Binding +1s:
Till Westmann
Justin Mclean
Henry Saputra
I've filed a JIRA issue to start addressing the issues Justin
mentioned before the next release:
https://iss
12 matches
Mail list logo
