Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On the other hand, somebody taking said snapshot and releasing it under the
name Project BOO, licensed under the ALv2. Is something that both the ALv2
license AND our trademark policy are totally fine with.
What if (not a fictional example; a real case) the code is taken
So there is - to my mind - the obvious stuff:
1. The package description should ACK our marks. End of Story there.
2. The package description should call out those cases where there are
significant deviations from the "official" distributions. Significant
deviations will be determined by the indiv
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> [Failing at dealing with this cross-posted and variously-branched discussion
> on two lists,
> so I am doing it too. Also OT with respect to Ross's declaration, but it has
> to do with the
> fact that "release" is not so well disting
Fascinating discussion, who started this thread? ;-)
On a more serious note (actually, very serious one):
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> Our policy is that the combined works are RELEASED under ALv2. That combined
> work
> is only licensed as such when the foundation fo
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> But I am still awaiting guidance from brand on whether a technical name
> usage - e.g. installer package name - is a use of the mark.
Makes two of us. I see a log of good consensus on this thread which helps
me get a gut feel on what is t
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:06 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> There are some special things here we do have absolute control over. If a
> project wants to provide the 'official' build, why not start signing the
> .jar?
This! This is such a great idea. Would love this to be weaved into
our policy (
All,
I believe the BatchEE podling is incorrectly set to monthly reports.
If I look at the schedule, they should have reported in June, but were late
and reported in July. I believe they should have been taken off monthly
but weren't and as a result were expected to report in August (and now
Sep
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > On Aug 20, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> Coming in late.
> >>
> >> A snapshot is not a release. Licenses "kick in" at distribution/
> >> release.
> >
>
