RE: Licensing Issue

2015-06-26 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
There's a difference between making a claim, affixing a notice, etc., and it being lawful and the right to having done so being legally defensible. I suspect this normally doesn't matter and is a trifle unless a conflict of some sort drags the usurper into court. Finding plagiarism, even in a

Re: Licensing Issue

2015-06-26 Thread Ted Dunning
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Oddly, you as an individual in the US can't *put* a work into the public > domain, but you can make a quit claim that forswears defense of any of the > exclusive rights of you, the copyright holder. That does not in any way > remove th

RE: Licensing Issue

2015-06-26 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Small but important correction. It is not permissible to claim a public-domain creation of another as "your own." There is no open-range, mustang copyright arrangement. In the US, works of the US Government are "born" public-domain. Not others. Oddly, you as an individual in the US can't *p

Re: [PROPOSAL]Pistachio

2015-06-26 Thread Andrew Purtell
Thanks Gavin. Please let me suggest that novelty is not a requirement for incubation, and a proposal doesn't need to make claims of novelty to be accepted. Should the proposal be accepted for incubation, you may find your new neighbors at Apache can do X where you weren't aware of it. It will be

Re: [PROPOSAL]Pistachio

2015-06-26 Thread Gavin Li
Thank you, Amareshwari. On Friday, June 26, 2015, Jake Farrell wrote: > Hi Amareshwari > Thanks for catching the incorrect wording for removing the dependency > before graduation, should have been before first incubating release, > updated. Glad to have you on board as a mentor > > Updated propo

Re: [IP-CLEARANCE] CouchDB CouchPerUser

2015-06-26 Thread Jan Lehnardt
No -1s in > 72 hours. This clearance passes. Thanks all! Jan -- > On 20 Jun 2015, at 16:02, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > Heya, > > on behalf of the CouchDB project, I’d like to request IP Clearance for > CouchDB CouchPerUser: > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-cle

[RESULT] [IP-CLEARANCE] CouchDB nano

2015-06-26 Thread Jan Lehnardt
No -1s in > 72 hours. This clearance passes. Thanks all! Jan -- > On 22 Jun 2015, at 12:32, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > Heya, > > on behalf of the CouchDB project, I’d like to request IP Clearance for > CouchDB nano: > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/c

Re: [IP-CLEARANCE] CouchDB Docker

2015-06-26 Thread Jan Lehnardt
No -1s in > 72 hours. This clearance passes. Thanks all! Jan -- > On 20 Jun 2015, at 15:58, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > Heya, > > on behalf of the CouchDB project, I’d like to request IP Clearance for > CouchDB Docker: > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Atlas version 0.5-incubating

2015-06-26 Thread Venkat Ranganathan
+1 (non-binding) Thanks Venkat On 6/24/15, 6:46 PM, "Venkatesh Seetharam" wrote: >Hello folks, > >This is a call for a vote on the Apache Atlas 0.5 incubating release. > >A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 9 +1's. > >Vote thread: http://s.apache.org/RyM >Results thr

Re: [PROPOSAL]Pistachio

2015-06-26 Thread Jake Farrell
Hi Amareshwari Thanks for catching the incorrect wording for removing the dependency before graduation, should have been before first incubating release, updated. Glad to have you on board as a mentor Updated proposal is now available on the wiki at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PistachioProp

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Atlas version 0.5-incubating

2015-06-26 Thread Arpit Gupta
+1 (non binding) We have been running regressions tests on this release and dont see any blockers. -- Arpit Gupta Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/ > On Jun 25, 2015, at 12:25 PM, Jakob Homan wrote: > > +1 (binding, forwarded from podling vote) > > On 25 June 2015 at 10:05, Jon Maron

Re: [DISCUSS] Communicating intent around non-release, downstream integration binary artifacts

2015-06-26 Thread Jochen Theodorou
Am 26.06.2015 11:39, schrieb Jochen Theodorou: Am 26.06.2015 09:19, schrieb Branko Čibej: On 25.06.2015 09:17, Jochen Theodorou wrote: [...] nightly source tarballs? Is that really a thing? Yes, it is, why wouldn't it be? Httpd isn't even written in Java, and yet it can actually run on compu

Re: [DISCUSS] Communicating intent around non-release, downstream integration binary artifacts

2015-06-26 Thread Jochen Theodorou
Am 26.06.2015 09:19, schrieb Branko Čibej: On 25.06.2015 09:17, Jochen Theodorou wrote: [...] nightly source tarballs? Is that really a thing? Yes, it is, why wouldn't it be? Httpd isn't even written in Java, and yet it can actually run on computers! :) I was asking because whoever is able

Re: [DISCUSS] Communicating intent around non-release, downstream integration binary artifacts

2015-06-26 Thread Branko Čibej
On 25.06.2015 09:17, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > Am 24.06.2015 23:32, schrieb Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH): >> For HTTPd I was referring to the assertion from Justin earlier in >> this thread " FWIW, httpd always had nightly tarballs available for >> consumption and testing." (though reading that now