Re: Blog policy for poddlings

This is also why there need to be disclaimers on releases and such. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > To clarify one step further: podlings are not official projects, so any > outreach via apache.org (and its name/recognition) needs appropriate > messaging. That is why we ha

Re: Blog policy for poddlings

To clarify one step further: podlings are not official projects, so any outreach via apache.org (and its name/recognition) needs appropriate messaging. That is why we have press@ :-) On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) < ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: > It's not ComD

RE: Blog policy for poddlings

It's not ComDev is press@ Sent from my Windows Phone From: Roman Shaposhnik Sent: ‎5/‎29/‎2015 7:11 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Blog policy for poddlings This is all very much c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin-0.7.1-incubating

Hi, Sorry but it’s -1 binding form me: - LICENSE is incorrect and missing 3rd party bundled software - Incorrect Apache license headers added to files under other licenses - Possible font licensing issues. Unless that is other IPMC member this it ok to fix these issue in a future release and I’l

Re: Blog policy for poddlings

This is all very much confusing ;-) Is there any chance we can arrive at a more consistent policy or should I ask over at comdev@ ? Thanks, Roman. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > When Apache MetaModel still in incubator we were asking access to post > blog at blogs.a.o a

Re: Blog policy for poddlings

When Apache MetaModel still in incubator we were asking access to post blog at blogs.a.o and was told that it is preferable that podlings wait until graduation to post in it. - Henry On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:17 AM, David Nalley wrote: > I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling fro

Re: Sentry 1.5.0 release (was Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux))

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 03:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> > Apache Sentry >> >> This one looks like a problem. A vote was taken for Sentry 1.5.0 on the >> podling dev list, but there has been no vote on general@incubator. >> >> >> h

Re: Blog policy for poddlings

I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a blog at blogs.a.o --David On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > can someone please remind me what's the policy > for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a > blogging platform? > > Thanks, > Ro

Re: Blog policy for poddlings

On Thu, May 28, 2015, at 09:43 PM, Dave Lester wrote: > My understanding is that only TLPs can publish to blogs.a.o. I guess that depends on whether you mean the top-level Apache blog there or starting a new blog. CloudStack started its blog on blogs.apache.org while we were a podling with (IIRC)

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator

Bringing back comments from a separate thread on board@ Sorry to see your vote of a -1 on the proposal due to the name. This was raised during the discussion phase and as stated in the discussion we are not against a name change, but saw it as something that was not a blocker to entering incubatio

Sentry 1.5.0 release (was Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux))

On Sun, May 10, 2015, at 03:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Apache Sentry > > This one looks like a problem. A vote was taken for Sentry 1.5.0 on the > podling dev list, but there has been no vote on general@incubator. > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sentry-dev/20

Re: June report prep

Thanks Ted, this is more clear now. You are right, to have monthly summary is also very important to share such information in project community, and it's good start point for people learn more about that project when they joined a new community Thanks. Best Regards! - Luke

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Jake Farrell wrote: > [X ] -1 Do not accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator because... As mentioned before I think the name is too close to Mesos, especially taking into account the ways those names are pronounced in various languages. This is not a veto of cou

[VOTE] Release Apache Kylin-0.7.1-incubating

Hi all, The Apache Kylin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Kylin 0.7.1 (incubating), the first release of Apache Kylin. Since this is first release after join Apache Incubating project, we would like to hear more feedback from incubator community and please help to

Re: June report prep

Incubator projects start with monthly reporting and then switch to quarterly after the first few reports. I think that it is very helpful to do a bit of the report each month even after switching to quarterly reporting because it is hard to remember everything that has happened after 3 months. Ev

Re: June report prep

What's the rotation rule of all incubator projects? I found our project in May's report but not on June Would like to know that and get ready for coming report. Thank you very much. Luke Best Regards! - Luke Han 2015-05-28 6:04 GMT+08:00 Marvin Humphrey : > On Tue, May 26,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator

+1 2015-05-29 11:34 GMT+08:00 Justin Erenkrantz : > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Jake Farrell > wrote: > > Based on the earlier discussion in thread [1], I would like to call a > VOTE > > to accept Mysos, an Apache Mesos framework for running MySQL instances, > as > > a new Apache Incubator