On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
>...
> In case you're curious -- I'd ask the same question, for example,
> about a community
> that decided to produce software that is be only applicable as an add-on
> for a small market share commercial offering.
>
The Foundation does
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>
>> > Graduation does not require diversity of the PMC. It requires that the
>> project be run according to
>> > the Apache Way which includes being open to any viewpoint brought to t
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> > Graduation does not require diversity of the PMC. It requires that the
> project be run according to
> > the Apache Way which includes being open to any viewpoint brought to the
> project, regardless
> > of the source. Furthermore, the
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> On 4/27/15 10:05 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
>> ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It's a tough one. We could be setting a precedence here that we absolutely
>>> do not want
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:34 AM Marko Rodriguez
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/), prior to being an
> Apache project, provided a tinkerpop-neo4j adaptor with each release.
> TinkerPop sees Neo4j as the "reference OLTP implementation" of TinkerPop.
> With Tin
I've often wondered why we don't open source more of the infra code. Maybe this
is the reason.
Perhaps we need a new "brand" for such projects. Something like "Apache Foo
(Infra)". This would be similar to the "(Incubator)" branding. We could even
adopt some of the same policies (e.g. no press
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> I’ll note that the only person I see from infra that has been proposed
> in the current PMC is Jake Ferrel:
>
> * Acquia: Jake Farrell
>
> Someone also correct me in that I don’t think Jake is a paid infra
> contractor.
>
> In add
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> I’ll note that the only person I see from infra that has been proposed
> in the current PMC is Jake Ferrel:
>
The other person is Dan Norris. Dan is a paid contractor, but talked
with me before volunteering himself. I told him ab
Sam, I don't *want* the role, but if you want one less task to do each month
I'd be happy to take on the chair role.
If someone actually *wants* the role then let them take it.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: sa3r...@gmail.com [mailto:sa3r...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Sam Ruby
Sent: Tuesday
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
>
> As for going straight to TLP I agree. Sam did say this was a possibility but
> I believe he (rightly so) wants to ensure that the proposal is solid before
> asking the board and IPMC to consider this path.
Suffice it to sa
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> I don't see how this is any different from any other project. The initial
> contributors will work on it to
> satisfy their needs. If organization X wants to use it they can contribute
> code to generalize the
> software and m
I don't see how this is any different from any other project. The initial
contributors will work on it to satisfy their needs. If organization X wants to
use it they can contribute code to generalize the software and make it useful
to their use case. As long as it doesn't break things for other
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:47 PM Sam Ruby Anyone
who is so inclined is welcome to edit the proposal directly.
>
>
> No urgency or timeframe in mind (other than preferably starting sometime
> in 2015ish). My current thinking is to follow in Steve's footprints and
> go directly to TLP, but I'm start
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> Not sure if your concern is diversity or scale, so I'll address both
> separately. If your concern is
> something else please be more explicit.
>
> Graduation does not require diversity of the PMC. It requires that the
> proje
On 4/27/15 10:05 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
> ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>> It's a tough one. We could be setting a precedence here that we absolutely
>> do not want to set. On the other hand, it's problematic (not to mention
>>
Not sure if your concern is diversity or scale, so I'll address both
separately. If your concern is something else please be more explicit.
Graduation does not require diversity of the PMC. It requires that the project
be run according to the Apache Way which includes being open to any viewpoint
Hello,
TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/), prior to being an Apache
project, provided a tinkerpop-neo4j adaptor with each release. TinkerPop sees
Neo4j as the "reference OLTP implementation" of TinkerPop. With TinkerPop's
migration to the Apache Software Foundation, TinkerPop 3.
I'd like to be on the initial list as well, so I've added myself.
On 24 April 2015 at 04:46, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Initial sketch placed on the wiki:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhimsyProposal
>
> Anyone who is so inclined is welcome to edit the proposal directly.
>
> No urgency or timefra
Apologies if this has been asked, but Rich's points got me
thinking. As it stands, I'm not sure I can see how Whimsy
can graduate without us squinting just so. Basically, I don't
see a clear way for the community to grow much beyond
the initial list of committers.
In a way, I'd rather see Whimsy g
On 4/27/15, 7:01 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Marvin Humphrey
>> wrote:
>>> ...So, if I look on the page `flx_olapdatagrid_ol.html`, I see the
>>>following text
>>> in the middle...
>>>
>>> Th
Hi Rich,
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 5:44 AM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Whimsy PMC
>
>
>On 04/27/2015 10:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
>> I’ll note that the only p
Apache CloudStack is receiving code for a Google GCE interface to the
CloudStack API.
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-gstack.html
Please vote to approve this contribution.
Lazy consensus applies.
If no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours, the vote passes.
Thanks,
-S
Apache CloudStack is receiving code for an EC2 interface to the CloudStack API.
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-ec2stack.html
Please vote to approve this contribution.
Lazy consensus applies.
If no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours, the vote passes.
Thanks,
-Sebast
On 04/27/2015 10:17 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
+1, that's what I was trying to convey.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 7:05 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Whimsy PMC
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015
On 04/27/2015 10:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
I’ll note that the only person I see from infra that has been proposed
in the current PMC is Jake Ferrel:
* Acquia: Jake Farrell
Someone also correct me in that I don’t think Jake is a paid infra
contractor.
In addition the way I see th
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> ...Our mission is "software for the public good". Whimsy is software for the
> ASF's good. How does the public benefit from Whimsy?...
It makes us more efficient. As a board member, Whimsy helps me spend
less time on the boring mechanics of our
26 matches
Mail list logo
