On 4/23/15, 2:06 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>> IIUC this is about additional Flex documentation being donated to be
>> published at http://flex.apache.org/ - if that's correct please
>> provide an example of how a trademark would be used in that context
>
>Alex is best to provide that given t
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- signatures and hashed correct
- artefact has incubating in it’s name
- LICENSE and NOTICE correct
- All source files have Apache headers
- No unexpected binaries in source release
- can compile from source
- all tests pass
Suggestions:
- You may want to consider addin
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I'd suggest striking the user@ mailing list. Keep the community (such as it
> is) on dev@ until traffic gets too heavy. I've seen early splitting of the
> user/dev keep a new project from reaching a good critical mass.
FWIW, I copied from Steve
I'd suggest striking the user@ mailing list. Keep the community (such as it
is) on dev@ until traffic gets too heavy. I've seen early splitting of the
user/dev keep a new project from reaching a good critical mass.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Initial sketch placed on the w
+1 binding
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:03 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (sending again as sent from wrong address first time)
>
> +1 binding
>
> For the source release I checked:
> - incubating in artifact name
> - signatures and hashes good
> - LICENSE and NOTICE ok
> - All source files have
Hi,
> We will certainly clean up this directory in the next release if this
> release is confirmed and the legal discussion leads to removal of such
> content from the project.
That’s good enough for me, the intent was there it’s just that a few files got
missed and will issue will be fixed befo
Justin,
You are right, it appears that google-plus was over-looked. Cue cymbals.
We will certainly clean up this directory in the next release if this
release is confirmed and the legal discussion leads to removal of such
content from the project.
If this release is voted down, we will strip it
HI,
Looks like some of the test content is still included in the release. Are you
good as per the legal discussion [1] with this.
For instance:
./streams-project-0.2-incubating/streams-contrib/streams-provider-google/google-gplus/src/test/resources/google_plus_activity_jsons.txt
./streams-
Infra already supports Whimsy so having a TLP is irrelevant in that respect
(although on reason Sam is doing this is because infra expressed a concern
about maintaining a service that only had Sam working on it).
Ross
-Original Message-
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Thurs
On Thursday, April 23, 2015, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Initial sketch placed on the wiki:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhimsyProposal
>
> Anyone who is so inclined is welcome to edit the proposal directly.
>
> No urgency or timeframe in mind (other than preferably starting sometime
> in 2015ish)
Hi,
> I'm vaguely trying to follow, can you clarify what you mean by "use
> those trademarks”?
By use I just mean have them appear in the existing text as they currently do.
Obviously the missing attributions would also need to be added.
That use depends if we have permission to use them or not
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Sree V wrote:
Please add me to the contributers page.
My wiki id is : SreeVaddi
Karma granted, enjoy!
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-ma
With no -1 votes being cast, this IP Clearance vote passes by lazy consensus.
I will update the status page and process the donation.
-Taylor
On Apr 20, 2015, at 3:10 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Apache Storm has received a code donation for integrating with Microsoft
> Azure Eventhubs:
>
>
Hi,
Please add me to the contributers
page.https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ContributorsGroup
My wiki id is : SreeVaddi
I have been contributing to drill, calcite, ranger, kafka and spark,from their
beginning at incubation.
Thanking you.
With Regards
Sree Vaddi650.213.2707 M
Initial sketch placed on the wiki:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhimsyProposal
Anyone who is so inclined is welcome to edit the proposal directly.
No urgency or timeframe in mind (other than preferably starting sometime
in 2015ish). My current thinking is to follow in Steve's footprints
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:01 PM, jan i wrote:
> ...all these edits need not be completed before the donation is tranferred,
> but should be before any real publication...
Agreed, and the best way to handle this is to create the corresponding
jira tickets before importing the content, to describe
On Thursday, April 23, 2015, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 4/22/15, 3:47 PM, "Justin Mclean" >
> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >> "Adobe Legal says we can fix trademark attributions after committing”
> >
> >By fix did they mean remove them all or add missing trademarks? What
> >exactly was the advice they
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>...I'm asking that you make sure we have permission to use those
> trademarks in the donation or consider removing them...
I'm vaguely trying to follow, can you clarify what you mean by "use
those trademarks"?
IIUC this is about additi
18 matches
Mail list logo