On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:35 PM jan i wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 14, 2015, David Nalley wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Henry Saputra > > wrote:
> > > Have any of the podling mentors help to verify the RC? I could not
> > > tell from the result VOTE link
> > >
> >
> > No - with A
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Chris Aniszczyk
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Ryan Blue wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache Parquet
> 1.6.0
> > release. This RC passed the vote in the Parquet commu
On Tuesday, April 14, 2015, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote:
> > Have any of the podling mentors help to verify the RC? I could not
> > tell from the result VOTE link
> >
>
> No - with ApacheCon coming up, and almost all of the mentors
> traveling, I
+1
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Ryan Blue wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache Parquet 1.6.0
> release. This RC passed the vote in the Parquet community with 2 binding
> IPMC votes. The thread is here:
> * http://s.apache.org/parquet-1.6.0-p
Thanks for linking to the MR release thread, Jake!
This is a good opportunity to remind people that the Parquet MR release
vote is on-going and could use a little attention, too.
Thanks!
rb
On 04/14/2015 06:01 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:
correction, mr vote is all ready on the IPMC list for vo
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Have any of the podling mentors help to verify the RC? I could not
> tell from the result VOTE link
>
No - with ApacheCon coming up, and almost all of the mentors
traveling, I don't think there's been any vote from any of the
mentors. (I am
I really hope we aren't setting the precedent that we can't look at
source code prior to bringing in a project to the incubator. Is there
a reason the repo remains private on Github?
In particular, you have what appears to be a relatively diverse set of
initial committers, but we can't look at who
Jake,
Great to hear these answers. Thanks for jumping on them.
+1 to graduate (binding)
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> Hey Ted
> The 21 Parquet PPMC members listed on the proposal come from 8 different
> companies, the new committers added do not all come from the sa
correction, mr vote is all ready on the IPMC list for vote since passing
the PPMC vote
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201504.mbox/%3C552A9797.5070100%40apache.org%3E
-Jake
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> Hey Ted
> The 21 Parquet PPMC members
Hey Ted
The 21 Parquet PPMC members listed on the proposal come from 8 different
companies, the new committers added do not all come from the same companies.
There are two different components to Parquet, format and mr. Format has
been successfully released and mr has just passed a PPMC on Apr 12
Hello folks,
We would like to propose a new incubator project called Apache Atlas. The
proposal is detailed at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AtlasProposal
We would like to explore the possibility of participating in the pTLP
process.
The text version of the proposal is below:
= Apache Atla
Could we have some discussion on this first? Jumping to a vote may be a
bit premature (or not ... thus the need to discuss). I have some questions
myself that would prevent me from being able to support the issue right
now. Presumably these can all be resolved, but it is hard to do so under a
72
12 matches
Mail list logo
