Re: Report reminders haven't fired

2015-02-25 Thread John D. Ament
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:33 PM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > It seems as though the automatic report reminder system has failed to > fire in a timely manner once again (sigh). I'll send out reminders to > podling dev lists manually tomorrow. > Is the script failing or is it just not runn

Report reminders haven't fired

2015-02-25 Thread Marvin Humphrey
Greets, It seems as though the automatic report reminder system has failed to fire in a timely manner once again (sigh). I'll send out reminders to podling dev lists manually tomorrow. If anybody has time to fiddle with the script, it's here: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=infrastruct

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Twill-0.5.0-incubating

2015-02-25 Thread Henry Saputra
Signature file look good Checksum files looks good NOTICE file looks good LICENSE file look good DISCLAIMER file exist No third party executables Source code compiled +1 (binding) Congrats! On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Terence Yim wrote: > Hi all, > > This is to call for a vote on releas

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.4 incubating (RC2)

2015-02-25 Thread Leonidas Fegaras
Hello, This vote is now closed and it has passed with 5 binding IPMC +1. There were no -1 votes, and no 0 votes. We now have the required number of positive binding votes and will therefore proceed with publishing this release. Thank you all for voting! Leonidas Fegaras Binding votes: +1 Alan Cab

Re: Dudes: save some of your pTLP energy and review this friggin' release!!!!

2015-02-25 Thread jan i
+1 binding jan i On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > Pretty please? :D > > > Regards, > Alan > > > On Feb 24, 2015, at 4:42 AM, Leonidas Fegaras > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > This vote is open for more than a week and we still need one more IPMC > vote. > > Could somebody h

Re: Dudes: save some of your pTLP energy and review this friggin' release!!!!

2015-02-25 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
+1 from me (binding): SIGS, checksums pass. One recommendation: have the release managers put their GPG keys in id.apache.org, then it will be present in: https://people.apache.org/keys/group/mrql.asc And no need to maintain a KEYS file. Cheers, Chris [chipotle:~/tmp/apache-mrql] mattmann% st

Re: Dudes: save some of your pTLP energy and review this friggin' release!!!!

2015-02-25 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Binding IPMC member votes always carry over. Many thanks for helping us! Regards, Alan > On Feb 25, 2015, at 7:27 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Technically, you only have 2. If you'd like to copy your binding IPMC vote > to general@ that would help ;-) > > John > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at

Re: Dudes: save some of your pTLP energy and review this friggin' release!!!!

2015-02-25 Thread John D. Ament
Technically, you only have 2. If you'd like to copy your binding IPMC vote to general@ that would help ;-) John On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:20 AM Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > Pretty please? :D > > > Regards, > Alan > > > On Feb 24, 2015, at 4:42 AM, Leonidas Fegaras > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > Th

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.4 incubating (RC2)

2015-02-25 Thread John D. Ament
+1 binding Release contents look good, git commit is perfect, staged maven looks fine. John On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 6:21 PM Leonidas Fegaras wrote: > Hello, > This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.4 incubating. > Apache MRQL is a query processing and optimization system for > large-scal

Dudes: save some of your pTLP energy and review this friggin' release!!!!

2015-02-25 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Pretty please? :D Regards, Alan > On Feb 24, 2015, at 4:42 AM, Leonidas Fegaras wrote: > > Hello, > This vote is open for more than a week and we still need one more IPMC vote. > Could somebody help us her? > Thanks > Leonidas Fegaras > > On 02/22/2015 01:00 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >> Pin

Re: pTLP process amendments

2015-02-25 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:27 PM, jan i wrote: >> The proposal only refer to new projects entering Apache, would it be worth >> while to consider a way for projects that entered Incubator recently and >> has enough (whatever that is) asf me

Re: pTLP process amendments

2015-02-25 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:27 PM, jan i wrote: > The proposal only refer to new projects entering Apache, would it be worth > while to consider a way for projects that entered Incubator recently and > has enough (whatever that is) asf members as committers ? That is a discussion for perhaps the I

Re: pTLP process amendments

2015-02-25 Thread jan i
On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > 3.7 --> That is not default for TLPs, as only PMC members subscribe to > private@ > > 3.8 --> Follow TLP recommendations and guidelines. > > 3.9 --> Follow TLP recommendations and guidelines. > > i.e. what is now written in 3.11 will cover

Re: pTLP process amendments

2015-02-25 Thread Niclas Hedhman
3.7 --> That is not default for TLPs, as only PMC members subscribe to private@ 3.8 --> Follow TLP recommendations and guidelines. 3.9 --> Follow TLP recommendations and guidelines. i.e. what is now written in 3.11 will cover these three points and can be removed. On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:18

[NOTICE] added Ripple committer to incubator group

2015-02-25 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi, according to: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/pmc.html I added the newly elected committer axemclion to the incubator group. He was already committer, so he couldn't be added to the group by infra. Thanks, Christian - T

Re: pTLP process amendments

2015-02-25 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Hi Niclas! First of all: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9195 Hopefully INFRA will respond soon so we can all collaborate on the content. At this point I've started the documentation to the level of details currently on Incubator pages. On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Niclas Hedhman

Re: Practical next steps for pTLP experiment

2015-02-25 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) >> wrote: >>> We don't need consensus from the board. We need data to allow the board to >>> evaluate properl