Quick immediate comment that "Apache H2O" is not really Apache project.
I assume you are referring to https://github.com/h2oai/h2o (or
https://github.com/h2oai/h2o-dev) ?
- Henry
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Thejas Nair wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to propose the inclusion of S
Hello everyone,
I would like to propose the inclusion of Singa as an Apache Incubator project.
Here is the proposal - https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SingaProposal
Please review the proposal and give feedback. I am planning to start a
vote after 7 days if the proposal looks good.
We are also s
+1 (and on a personal note, thank you for making possible to, once again, avoid
throwing my own hat into the ring).
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 12:32 PM
To: Incubator General
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] So
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> ...I would be happy and enthusiastic to help by working with the Incubator
> project in this role
+1, thanks!
We have a growing number of survivors who demonstrate that it's
possible to do a great job as an Incubator PMC chair without los
Thanks to the Kylin guys for their support. And to Marvin. And Roman.
I have spent a lot of time considering and have decided that I will accept
this nomination. The source of my reticence is that if I take on this
responsibility, I will have to become part of the missing-mentor problem
and pull
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
>...
> Totally agreed! Who can help me learning the ropes on how ComDev
> documentation is maintained, etc?
>
Maybe ask on dev@community rather than general@ ?? :-P
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> There are a few things that I would suggest for "next steps":
>>
>> 1) Draft a template resolution. Starting in the wiki is fine, but you'll
>> want to involve board@ when you have yo
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
>> wrote:
>>> In short, the pTLP designation is a bit too opaque
>>
>> So you mean all TLPs should have status labels
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> There are a few things that I would suggest for "next steps":
>
> 1) Draft a template resolution. Starting in the wiki is fine, but you'll
> want to involve board@ when you have your first draft done. This will also
> start the discussion among
There are a few things that I would suggest for "next steps":
1) Draft a template resolution. Starting in the wiki is fine, but you'll
want to involve board@ when you have your first draft done. This will also
start the discussion among the Directors (recall: the Board hasn't even
agreed to try th
Thanks for the nomination, Roman. And thanks for support from Seshu and Luke.
I am trying my best to help projects coming to Apache incubator to
understand the Apache way and be prepared to be active and healthy top
level project.
However, after working with Ted in several podlings, I would love
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> ...as I mentioned in a different thread, I feel really
>> passionate about championing the pTLP experiment
>
> So that I can decide to agree or flame (*), do you have a de
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> ...as I mentioned in a different thread, I feel really
> passionate about championing the pTLP experiment
So that I can decide to agree or flame (*), do you have a definition
of "the pTLP experiment" with a permanent URL (wiki page or
Hi!
as I mentioned in a different thread, I feel really
passionate about championing the pTLP experiment.
To that end, here's what's going to happen shortly:
#1 a couple of new projects that feel equally enthusiastic
about trying a pTLP route (and have a level of support
from a few
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> In short, the pTLP designation is a bit too opaque
>
> So you mean all TLPs should have status labels?
>
> Might be useful...probatory, active, low activity, attic candidat
> On Jan 27, 2015, at 6:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> In short, the pTLP designation is a bit too opaque
>
> So you mean all TLPs should have status labels?
>
> Might be useful...probatory, active, low activity, attic c
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> In short, the pTLP designation is a bit too opaque
So you mean all TLPs should have status labels?
Might be useful...probatory, active, low activity, attic candidate...why not.
-Bertrand
-
+1 for Ted Dunning and Henry Saputra
They both are very actively helping Kylin incubating from the beginning.
Their passion, professional and experience brings great value for our
incubator project. With their very nice coach, all of us gained a lot of
from them, especially about run open source c
> On Jan 27, 2015, at 12:31 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> ...- do away w/ the pTLP name, just make it a regular TLP...
>
> I don't like that, IMO pTLPs have to be explicitly flagged, to make
> sure both users and Apache folks a
+1 for Ted Dunning and Henry Saputra
Both are mentors of Apache Kylin and such fantastic mentors they areŠ
Regards
Seshu Adunuthula
On 1/26/15, 11:16 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
>+1 for Ted Dunning.
>
>Ted has passion for the Incubator's mission. He is an excellent consensus
>builder, with
Dear Incubator,
On behalf of the CouchDB project, I’m requesting IP Clearance for the CouchDB
Mango contribution:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/couchdb-mango.xml?view=markup
Thank you!
Best
Jan
--
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with Open
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> ...- do away w/ the pTLP name, just make it a regular TLP...
I don't like that, IMO pTLPs have to be explicitly flagged, to make
sure both users and Apache folks are aware of their "immaturity".
-Bertrand
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> ...For Flex, we did not have an established community of developers coming in
> with the code. But I don’t know that we could have recruited enough ASF
> members to be committers
I agree with that, I was a Flex mentor but only interested i
23 matches
Mail list logo
