I ran rat and found that there are a number of Markdown, HTML, Scala archetype
files that don’t seem to have the proper license header.
Regards,
Alan
On Oct 22, 2014, at 12:29 AM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is our second try to release Flink 0.7.0-incubating. The last time we
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> It¹s not a requirement for graduation from the Incubator, as succinctly
> summarized by Roy (and I am +1 on this):
>
> http://markmail.org/message/w56cmyri4osgcgud
+1 This has been covered often, and recently. -C
> ++
This doesn’t seem to exist. Does that matter?
Regards,
Alan
On Oct 22, 2014, at 12:29 AM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1016
> ---
Belatedly, I also say +1 as the NOTICE and LICENSE look good (an
important issue of late), source compiles, tests pass, signature is
good, process is good, etc.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is our second try to release Flink 0.7.0-incubating. The last
Hi,
the vote has passed with +3 binding votes from the IPMC.
+1 votes are from:
Justin Mclean
Alan Gates
Henry Saputra
Thank you for checking the release. I'll publish the release now
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> - vote good
> - artefact n
