Re: [Vote] IPMC - Release Apache Stratos 4.0.0 - Incubating RC1

2014-04-29 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Correction: Friday, May 2, 2014 at 11:30:00 PM PDT, Saturday, May 3, 2014 at 12:00:00 Noon IST. Thanks On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > Hi All, > > This is the first release candidate of Apache Stratos 4.0.0-incubating. > > This is the IPMC vote, the PPMC vote [1] pas

[Vote] IPMC - Release Apache Stratos 4.0.0 - Incubating RC1

2014-04-29 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
Hi All, This is the first release candidate of Apache Stratos 4.0.0-incubating. This is the IPMC vote, the PPMC vote [1] passed with 9 binding +1s. This release fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12326291&styleName=Html&projectId=12314521

Re: [VOTE] Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator

2014-04-29 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, at 08:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache > Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now. > [X] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator (binding) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twi

Re: [VOTE] Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator

2014-04-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 (binding) On Apr 29, 2014, at 7:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 > > Regards > JB > > On 04/28/2014 03:49 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache >> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now. >> >> [ ] +1 A

Re: [VOTE] Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator

2014-04-29 Thread Alex Heneveld
+1 (non-binding) and thanks everyone for the support so far! Best Alex On 28/04/2014 14:49, Chip Childers wrote: Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now. [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator [ ]

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP

2014-04-29 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
+1 to graduate. I'd like to echo Paul's sentiments .. thanks for the support and nudging! Sanjiva. On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote: > I'd like to add my thanks to the mentors. Very useful and effective and > hard working on behalf of Stratos. > > I support this: +1. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator

2014-04-29 Thread John Chambers
+1 binding Good luck guys. Cheers John Chambers On 29 April 2014 15:51, Imesh Gunaratne wrote: > +1 > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Lakmal Warusawithana >wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Chip Childers > >wrote: > > > > > Based on the previous discussion of

Re: [VOTE] Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator

2014-04-29 Thread Imesh Gunaratne
+1 On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Lakmal Warusawithana wrote: > +1 > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Chip Childers >wrote: > > > Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache > > Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now. > > > > [ ] +1 Accept

Re: [VOTE] Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator

2014-04-29 Thread Lakmal Warusawithana
+1 On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache > Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now. > > [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator > [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brooklyn > [

Re: [VOTE] Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator

2014-04-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 Regards JB On 04/28/2014 03:49 PM, Chip Childers wrote: Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now. [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brooklyn [ ] -1 Do

Re: [VOTE] Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator

2014-04-29 Thread sebgoa
+1 (non-binding) -sebastien On Apr 29, 2014, at 12:14 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote: > +1 > > Paul > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Sergio Fernández < > sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> On 28/04/14 15:49, Chip Childers wrote: >> >>> Based on the previous dis

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP

2014-04-29 Thread Mohammad Noureldin
Hi Suresh Thanks a lot for including me in the list of members when graduating. Unfortunately I didn't have enough time to help and I don't think that will change soon enough on the level that I can consider myself as an active member, hence I would like my name to be removed Good luck with th

Re: [VOTE] Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator

2014-04-29 Thread Paul Fremantle
+1 Paul On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Sergio Fernández < sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at> wrote: > +1 > > > On 28/04/14 15:49, Chip Childers wrote: > >> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache >> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP

2014-04-29 Thread Paul Fremantle
I'd like to add my thanks to the mentors. Very useful and effective and hard working on behalf of Stratos. I support this: +1. Paul On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Afkham Azeez wrote: > +1 from me > > Azeez > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Suresh Marru wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Si

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Slider into the incubator

2014-04-29 Thread Steve Loughran
On 28 April 2014 19:19, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > > Congrats and welcome to ASF incubator guys! > > Indeed! Best of luck growing your community and project! > > Thanks, > Roman. > thx, I'll hope to submit stuff into bigtop when possibl

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP

2014-04-29 Thread Afkham Azeez
+1 from me Azeez On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Suresh Marru wrote: > Hi All, > > Since entering Incubation in June 2013, the stratos podling has evolved > and is now ready to self-govern. The community has extensively debated > graduation readiness [1] and overwhelmingly voted positively [2

Re: [VOTE] Accept Slider into the incubator

2014-04-29 Thread Andreas Neumann
Andrew, Roman, Nick, thanks for your insights. I can see that some competition within the incubator can help with advancement of technology, and who knows, Slider and Twill may have completely different motivations and focus on distinct aspects of the same problem. I also agree that Slider can hel