Re: Licensing query - Perl libraries

2014-04-25 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > I've been approached by a project that wishes to enter the incubator. They > have a question regarding licensing. Their project is in Perl, and depends > on CPAN modules that are licensed under the Artistic license. The question > they have is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Slider into the incubator

2014-04-25 Thread Andrew Purtell
Based on prior experience I'd say the Members take a liberal attitude to duplication of efforts. There are pros and cons. "Constructive competition" versus siloing and dissipation of the potential of a common community. Given what I've read on this thread I hope ultimately Twill, Helix, and Slider,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Slider into the incubator

2014-04-25 Thread Andreas Neumann
-0 (non-binding). Slider has a lot of good ideas and features and there is no doubt it has significant value. Yet I do think that there is large overlap between Slider and recently incubated Twill. The Twill community has repeatedly offered collaboration and/or convergence of Twill and Slider into

Licensing query - Perl libraries

2014-04-25 Thread Rich Bowen
I've been approached by a project that wishes to enter the incubator. They have a question regarding licensing. Their project is in Perl, and depends on CPAN modules that are licensed under the Artistic license. The question they have is whether this will impede their project entering the Incub

Re: [VOTE] Accept Slider into the incubator

2014-04-25 Thread Dilli Arumugam
+1 (non binding) On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote: > +1 (binding). > > Mahadev Konar > Hortonworks Inc. > http://hortonworks.com/ > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:39 PM, larry mccay > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Apr 17, 2014 9:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" > wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Slider into the incubator

2014-04-25 Thread Mahadev Konar
+1 (binding). Mahadev Konar Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/ On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:39 PM, larry mccay wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > On Apr 17, 2014 9:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: > > > I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator > > > > > > https://wiki.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Accept Slider into the incubator

2014-04-25 Thread larry mccay
+1 (non-binding) On Apr 17, 2014 9:02 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: > I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal > > [ ] +1 Accept Slider into the Incubator > [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Slider > [ ] -1 Do not ac

Re: Nightly Builds from non-ASF Servers

2014-04-25 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > The Apache Flex project currently uses builds.a.o and Jenkins to create > nightly builds. We are looking into creating a relatively-complex custom > CI setup on external servers with lots of different browsers involved in > automated testing o

Re: [brooklyn-dev] Re: [PROPOSAL] Brooklyn

2014-04-25 Thread Ignasi Barrera
Good to see Brooklyn here. Look forward to seeing the project progress! El 25/04/2014 08:39, "Duncan Johnston Watt" < duncan.johnstonw...@cloudsoftcorp.com> escribió: > Joe > > Thanks. Much appreciated. > > Please can you add yourself to the wiki proposal before Chip closes this > thread and moves

Re: [brooklyn-users] [PROPOSAL] Brooklyn -- merging mailing lists

2014-04-25 Thread Jim Jagielski
Related-Topic: If an additional Mentor would be beneficial, I volunteer. On Apr 25, 2014, at 7:05 AM, Duncan Johnston Watt wrote: > +1 to deprecating brooklyn-users and focusing on -dev list. > > > On 25 April 2014 11:03, Alex Heneveld wrote: > >> >> Henry, >> >> Gotcha. So with that in m

Re: [brooklyn-users] Re: [PROPOSAL] Brooklyn -- merging mailing lists

2014-04-25 Thread Duncan Johnston Watt
+1 to deprecating brooklyn-users and focusing on -dev list. On 25 April 2014 11:03, Alex Heneveld wrote: > > Henry, > > Gotcha. So with that in mind, our users list is not so active that it > couldn't be merged with the dev list. And we'd like to get existing users > more deeply involved! > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Brooklyn -- merging mailing lists

2014-04-25 Thread Alex Heneveld
Henry, Gotcha. So with that in mind, our users list is not so active that it couldn't be merged with the dev list. And we'd like to get existing users more deeply involved! So +1 to Henry's suggestion to have a dev@ list but *not* a users@ list initially as we seek to enter the Apache inc