Thank you, Marvin. This is very valuable, especially the way you walked
through your thought process. We'll try to apply the same logic for our
other bundled dependencies in our binary distribution with our next RC.
Cheers,
James
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:08 AM, James Taylor wrote:
> Yes, our source and binary releases have different NOTICE/LICENSE files.
Excellent!
This is great for the Phoenix podling, and also progress for the Incubator and
the ASF.
There has always been the need for tuning the NOTICE file for a bin
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:06 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> The copyright for the bits we're bundling. See the LICENSE file I included
> at the end of my email. For example:
>
> Guava, version 12.0.1, http://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/
> Copyright 2008 Google Inc.
>
> Is that the correct way to
Hi Justin,
Yes, our source and binary releases have different NOTICE/LICENSE files.
The source ones are simple, as we have no dependencies. It's the binary one
I'm trying to get clarity on.
Thanks,
James
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I assuming you source and bi
This is a release of Apache Sentry, version 1.3.0-incubating
It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/Ckp
Source files : http://people.apache.org/~kramachandran/sentry-1.3.0-rc0/
Tag to be voted on (rc0):
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentr
Hi,
I assuming you source and binary releases will require different NOTICE/LICENSE
files?
For the upcoming Apache FlexUnit release I created a NOTICE and LICENCE for the
source release (which is included in the source zip/tar) and a NOTICE.bin and
LICENCE.bin for the binary release (which is
