Re: wiki perms for JohnKinsella

2013-06-04 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 9:37 AM, John Kinsella wrote: > Hey folks - I wanted to add myself to the mentor list for Stratos, but I > don't seem to have privs to edit the page > (https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StratosProposal). > > Can those be granted? Done. Marvin Humphrey

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator

2013-06-04 Thread Henry Saputra
+1 (binding) Looks like a good project with awesome initial contributors, good luck guys. - Henry On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (398J) < paul.m.rami...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > All, > > I'd like to call a VOTE for the acceptance of Apache HotdoG into the > Incubator. I'll leav

wiki perms for JohnKinsella

2013-06-04 Thread John Kinsella
Hey folks - I wanted to add myself to the mentor list for Stratos, but I don't seem to have privs to edit the page (https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StratosProposal). Can those be granted? John - To unsubscribe, e-mail: genera

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator

2013-06-04 Thread Ramirez, Paul M (398J)
Jim, Thanks, nice catch updating the "Current Status" to: We're looking for people interested in HotdoG and to move the project into the Apache Community. --Paul On 6/4/13 10:55 AM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote: > >On Jun 4, 2013, at 1:28 PM, "Ramirez, Paul M (398J)" > wrote: >> >> We're looking fo

[DISCUSS] [VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator

2013-06-04 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
Hey Jim, I think it should probably read: We're looking for people interested in HotDog and to move the proposal into the Apache Community. The project is moving from a previously open source external community into Apache. I've updated the proposal on the wiki as such: https://wiki.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator

2013-06-04 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jun 4, 2013, at 1:28 PM, "Ramirez, Paul M (398J)" wrote: > > We're looking for developers and sponsors. > Sponsors?? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: gen

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator

2013-06-04 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
+1 (binding). Cheers, Chris ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~ma

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator

2013-06-04 Thread Ramirez, Paul M (398J)
Correction that is Monday, June 10th. --Paul From: , JPL mailto:paul.m.rami...@jpl.nasa.gov>> Date: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 10:28 AM To: "general@incubator.apache.org" mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>> Subject: [VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubato

[VOTE] Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator

2013-06-04 Thread Ramirez, Paul M (398J)
All, I'd like to call a VOTE for the acceptance of Apache HotdoG into the Incubator. I'll leave the VOTE open for the rest of the week and close it out Monday, June 11th early am PT. [ ] +1 Accept Apache HotdoG into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don't care. [ ] -1 Don't accept Apache HotdoG because...

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

2013-06-04 Thread Greg Stein
On Jun 4, 2013 9:40 AM, "ant elder" wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > >... > > And this isn't some podling trying to figure shit out. This is some > > Incubator tooling that has explicitly incorporated third party code. We > > absolutely know third party code is there

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

2013-06-04 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:40 AM, ant elder wrote: > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >> You guys are insane. This is dead simple, or it should be if you all would >> stop being bureaucratic, obstinate meddlers. >> >> -g > > Alan asked the question "Would this suffice:" so we're j

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

2013-06-04 Thread Alan Cabrera
On Jun 4, 2013, at 6:34 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> As I said, it does look good. But I don't see the LinkedIn Copyright >> in any files under tools/. The copyright/license header should remain >> in the files that you copied into our repos.

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

2013-06-04 Thread Kevan Miller
On Jun 4, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> As I said, it does look good. But I don't see the LinkedIn Copyright >> in any files under tools/. The copyright/license header should remain >> in the files that you copied into our repos.

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

2013-06-04 Thread Kevan Miller
On Jun 4, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:58 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >> >>> On Jun 4, 2013 4:22 AM, "ant elder" wrote: This "when in doubt leave it out" approach has gone a long way at smo

Re: svn commit: r1489076 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: src/asf/incubator/podlings.py tests/test_podlings.py

2013-06-04 Thread Alan Cabrera
On Jun 3, 2013, at 2:47 PM, sebb wrote: > On 3 June 2013 18:43, wrote: >> Author: adc >> Date: Mon Jun 3 17:43:51 2013 >> New Revision: 1489076 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1489076 >> Log: >> Minor sketch of some podling code before I forget to check it in. > > And perhaps add some com

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

2013-06-04 Thread Alan Cabrera
On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:58 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> On Jun 4, 2013 4:22 AM, "ant elder" wrote: >>> >>> This "when in doubt leave it out" approach has gone a long way at >>> smoothing podling release reviews compared to the olden days. >> >

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

2013-06-04 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Jun 4, 2013 4:22 AM, "ant elder" wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >> >> > >> > Simple as that. >> > >> >> If only. >> >> This is the old "what goes in the NOTICE file" debate that has >> probably caused more ema

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

2013-06-04 Thread Alan Cabrera
On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > As I said, it does look good. But I don't see the LinkedIn Copyright > in any files under tools/. The copyright/license header should remain > in the files that you copied into our repos. It is impossible to tell > what is from LinkedIn. > I'll a

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

2013-06-04 Thread Kevan Miller
On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Jun 4, 2013 4:22 AM, "ant elder" wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >> >>> >>> Simple as that. >>> >> >> If only. >> >> This is the old "what goes in the NOTICE file" debate that has >> probably caused more em

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

2013-06-04 Thread Greg Stein
On Jun 4, 2013 4:22 AM, "ant elder" wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > > > > Simple as that. > > > > If only. > > This is the old "what goes in the NOTICE file" debate that has > probably caused more emails and confusion than any other topic here. > > My understandin

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

2013-06-04 Thread ant elder
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > Simple as that. > If only. This is the old "what goes in the NOTICE file" debate that has probably caused more emails and confusion than any other topic here. My understanding of the current thinking on this is to only include something in