Hi,
On 19/11/12 06:53, dsh wrote:
A few comments in regards to the proposal draft and "linked data"
specifically:
extremely welcome ;-)
* maybe consider calling out that you are striving towards implementing the
Linked Data Platform 1.0 W3C draft (at least that's how I understand the
proposa
As far as I know, Lyo is internally discussing and planning to implement
the Linked Data Platform somehow:
http://www.w3.org/wiki/LDP_Implementations
But I don't have more details, sorry.
Best,
On 16/11/12 19:26, dsh wrote:
Hi,
out of curiosity - how does this relate to or maybe even comple
Apache Nuvem will define an open application programming interface
for common cloud application services, allowing applications to be
easily ported across the most popular cloud platforms. It is
currently composed of multiple cloud SCA components (Data, Queue, Chat),
and supports multiple cloud pla
I second this. Short of the name search these folks are ready to graduate.
Patrick
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the report, Crunch!
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
>> + The Crunch community has been very active and continues
Hi,
out of curiosity - how does this relate to or maybe even complement Eclipse
Lyo [1]? For instance is Lyo one of the Enterprise Linked Data scenarios
which you have been mentioning above?
[1] http://www.eclipse.org/lyo/
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Sebastian Schaffert <
se
Heh yeah I as well had the tuplespace implementation associated with Linda
as I read Apache Linda :) Where Linda itself might have become historic,
the concept still is in use. E.g. [1].
[1]
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1739850&CFID=202524342&CFTOKEN=19022440
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Nov 16,
Hi folks,
already voted as a JSPWiki mentor therefore
[X] +1 approve, release Apache JSPWiki 2.9.0-incubating
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and giving a reason)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
PS: More votes and/or feedback would be welcome ... :-)
On 14.11.12 02:03, Florian Holeczek wro
On 19/11/12 01:01, Benson Margulies wrote:
Ted,
I did read the whole thing, and I'd like to join you in drawing a
curtain in front of the man.
The proposers of this project didn't create the problem of the term
'linked data', and they can't fix it. As you suggest, all they can do
is pick a TLP
Hi Jukka,
Sorry missed this email.
> Sounds like you're doing pretty good, and congratulations for the
> release! I'm also happy to see many sign-offs on your report.
>
Thanks
>> + Issues that must be addressed before graduation are:
>> +
>> + - Making a release
>> + - Attracting users and
A few comments in regards to the proposal draft and "linked data"
specifically:
* maybe consider calling out that you are striving towards implementing the
Linked Data Platform 1.0 W3C draft (at least that's how I understand the
proposal)
* will Linda (or whatever name you'll choose) cover data go
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 11/14/12 7:37 AM, "Franklin, Matthew B." wrote:
>
> >Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in
> >good shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the
> >Incub
+1 (binding)
On 11/14/12 7:37 AM, "Franklin, Matthew B." wrote:
>Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in
>good shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the
>Incubator.
>
>The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StreamsProposal and
>also c
On 11/14/12 6:14 AM, "Jukka Zitting" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We still have two missing reports: Helix and Syncope. Helix, since
>you're only just starting, a very simple report like the one from
>Ripple is quite enough for now. Syncope, you already passed the
>graduation vote, so there isn't that much to
On 19.11.2012 13:15, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> On 19/11/12 11:20, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> we have had a brainstorming round and came up with the suggestion "Apache
>>> Marmotta" as a new name. We looked a bit and the n
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 19/11/12 11:20, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> we have had a brainstorming round and came up with the suggestion "Apache
>> Marmotta" as a new name. We looked a bit and the name seems not to be taken
>> yet, so there would
On 19/11/12 11:20, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
Hi all,
we have had a brainstorming round and came up with the suggestion "Apache
Marmotta" as a new name. We looked a bit and the name seems not to be taken yet, so
there would probably no legal issues with the name.
Why "Marmotta"? It is Italian
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Sebastian Schaffert
wrote:
> ...we have had a brainstorming round and came up with the suggestion "Apache
> Marmotta" as a new name...
"Marmotta iconic VQS" and "Marmotta Multimedia AG" both return search
results on Google, but those don't look too bad to me in
Hi all,
we have had a brainstorming round and came up with the suggestion "Apache
Marmotta" as a new name. We looked a bit and the name seems not to be taken
yet, so there would probably no legal issues with the name.
Why "Marmotta"? It is Italian for "marmot", one of the predominant animals in
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> I suggest choosing a different name
Selinda comes to mind - as in "semantic Linda", and Google doesn't
know it about software.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge
Hi Ted,
I read all your mail ( :-) ) and I am sorry that this evolved into such a
discussion. For me, "Linked Data" is as specific as "Web", "Stack" or "Heap",
and I would claim it is like this for at least the rest of the Web community
and possibly the database community as well. But regardles
20 matches
Mail list logo
