On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
>>...
>
> It seems that we're talking about this location:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/bigtop/bigtop-0.3.0-incubating/
>
>> Again, we don't distribute non-Apache software,
>
> I didn
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
>...
It seems that we're talking about this location:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/bigtop/bigtop-0.3.0-incubating/
> Again, we don't distribute non-Apache software,
I didn't find any non-Apache software in the location noted above.
>
Hi Karl,
Done in:
commit -m "- add ManifoldCF resolution"
/Users/mattmann/src/asf/board/board_agenda_2012_05_16.txt
Sending/Users/mattmann/src/asf/board/board_agenda_2012_05_16.txt
Transmitting file data ...
Committed revision 34937.
Cheers,
Chris
On May 7, 2012, at 6:01 AM
On 05/05/2012 01:32 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> I'm just wondering about where do I find for example the licensing
> metadata for example for the files in
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/bigtop/bigtop-0.3.0-incubating/repos/fedora16/hive/
>
> Or am I just missing something obvious? Like that
On 4 May 2012 16:34, Alan Gates wrote:
>
> > * In that case there might still be a role for BigTop to provide a
> > central repository for such easily consumable upstream releases. This
> > would be somewhat similar to the discussions that took place a few
> > years ago about whether and how the
On 05/08/2012 05:50 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>>
> I don't understand the BigTop use cases
Perhaps this pres
On 05/08/2012 05:50 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>>
> I don't understand the BigTop use cases
Perhaps this pres
With 4 binding +1's from the IPMC, I'll add the resolution to the board agenda.
-- Owen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>
I don't understand the BigTop use cases
>>>
>>> Perhaps this preso can help a bit:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~rv
On 5/4/2012 1:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> In the Board agenda, we have a line where each Director can state they have
> reviewed the report (before the meeting). They can also append queries and
> comments. Little mini-discussions kinda happen in those comments.
>
> Point here is: provide a similar
Le 5/7/12 2:47 PM, sebb a écrit :
On 7 May 2012 10:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r1333797):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/syncope/tags/syncope-1.0.0-RC1-incubating/
There
This is the Apache Wink 1.2.0-incubating release.
We are requesting a lazy consensus vote, as we have already received 4
binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on wink-dev.
Vote thread :
http://www.mail-archive.com/wink-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg04322.html
Vote result:
http://www.mail
On May 7, 2012 11:57 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Jukka Zitting
wrote:
>
> > Now (again IIUC) the interesting bit is whether it's better for BigTop
> > to be repackaging and -distributing upstream components by itself, or
> > if it would in fact be better for Big
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>>> I don't understand the BigTop use cases
>>
>> Perhaps this preso can help a bit:
>> http://people.apache.org/~rvs/apache-bigtop2.pdf
>
> Notes from this presentation:
> * 100% A
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Now (again IIUC) the interesting bit is whether it's better for BigTop
> to be repackaging and -distributing upstream components by itself, or
> if it would in fact be better for BigTop to simply provide something
> like "bigtop-x.y.rpm" and
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> I don't understand the BigTop use cases
>
> Perhaps this preso can help a bit:
> http://people.apache.org/~rvs/apache-bigtop2.pdf
Notes from this presentation:
* 100% Apache Bigdata management distribution
* Bigtop is a distribution f
Here the results for retiring the zeta components podling.
6 binding +1 : Jukka Zitting, Bertrand Delacretaz, Ralph Goers, Julien
Vermillard, Alan D. Cabrera, Matthew B. Franklin
Julien
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On May 3, 2012,
Hi Karl,
Great to hear!
The next step would be emailing it to the board@ list (for now) since there is
no
May agenda file as of yet (from when I last looked).
Then, someone with the sufficient karma should be able to commit it to the
agenda for you (I'll do so if no one else beats me to it).
On 7 May 2012 10:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following
> artifacts up for a vote:
>
> SVN source tag (r1333797):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/syncope/tags/syncope-1.0.0-RC1-incubating/
There must be an Incubator DISCLAI
>From the connectors-dev thread we have three binding IPMC +1's. There
were no -1's. 72 hours have elapsed. So it looks like the vote
passes!
What are the next steps in getting the resolution added to the board
agenda for May?
Karl
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> A vote
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r1333797):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/syncope/tags/syncope-1.0.0-RC1-incubating/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesyncope-034/
S
21 matches
Mail list logo
