On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
> On May 2, 2012 5:57 PM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
>...
>> Stated interests, and cross-community awareness are at odds with each
> other.
>>
>> The Board randomly assigns shepherds to t
Hi,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> I already joined ipmc when Amber invited me (acknowledged by ipmc too).
Indeed you did, it simply looks like the relevant records
(committee-info.txt, etc.) didn't get updated. I'll fix that.
> Which status file did you refer to?
http:/
Hi, Jukka.
I already joined ipmc when Amber invited me (acknowledged by ipmc too). Which
status file did you refer to?
Thanks,
Raymond Feng
Sent from my iPhone
On May 2, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To a large extent the Incubator relies on the efforts of our mentors
> t
Hi,
To a large extent the Incubator relies on the efforts of our mentors
to help podling communities learn the Apache Way and the various ASF
policies and practices. Usually this works pretty well, but every know
and then we see podlings that are left struggling with little or no
mentor help. An u
+1 non-binding
On 02.05.2012 11:28, Fabian Christ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the first Apache Stanbol (incubating) release. Please vote for
> releasing
>
> *Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating*
>
> The RC7 for this release has passed our PPMC vote and we already have
> three binding +1 votes from IPMC
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On May 2, 2012 5:57 PM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
>
> On May 2, 2012 8:10 AM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
> >...
> > I don't imagine the "bucketing" to be enshrined in written process, or
> > even be fixed. More of a convenience. We might do it b
On May 2, 2012 8:10 AM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
>...
> I don't imagine the "bucketing" to be enshrined in written process, or
> even be fixed. More of a convenience. We might do it by, for example,
> asking Shepherds to identify the projects they would *prefer* to
> shepherd and why. To continue my
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
>if IBM (and Rob) know of an IP issue in the code base
This is not a _if_ there is an affirmative public statement by Rob
that this the case
> The fact that there has been no such revelation has to be sufficient at this
> point.
But t
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>
>
>
>> PS: the specific svn revisions here are not the central point, the
>> point is the lack of any discussion/scrutiny on any of these followed
>> by the self-fulfilling prophecy: "To
@Norbert,
It seems more direct to ask Rob what he was thinking of when he made that post
last June.
I can imagine two kinds of remediation that might have happened or be needed
with respect to Symphony:
1. Perhaps IBM detected IP issues in the OO.o code base they received under
license from
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Raymond Feng wrote:
I need write access too to copy and sign off the Amber report.
RaymondFeng
rf...@apache.org
Should be granted now
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.or
Hi,
I need write access too to copy and sign off the Amber report.
RaymondFeng
rf...@apache.org
Thanks,
Raymond
On May 2, 2012, at 6:40 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2012, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>> I went to go take care of this so Jukka wouldn't have to, but I don't have
>> write acc
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
I went to go take care of this so Jukka wouldn't have to, but I don't
have write access yet myself. :) Can someone please add me?
Wiki user: MarvinHumphrey
I've added you to the admin group[1], so you can add others to the
Contributors group[2] goi
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Fabian Christ
wrote:
> I need write access to the incubator Wiki.
I went to go take care of this so Jukka wouldn't have to, but I don't
have write access
yet myself. :) Can someone please add me?
Wiki user: MarvinHumphrey
Thanks,
Marvin Humphrey
>-Original Message-
>From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 8:09 AM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Shepherds for podling reports
>
>On 2 May 2012 12:50, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Ross G
Hi,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I don't imagine the "bucketing" to be enshrined in written process, or
> even be fixed. More of a convenience. We might do it by, for example,
> asking Shepherds to identify the projects they would *prefer* to
> shepherd and why.
Sounds u
On 2 May 2012 12:50, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
...
>>Looking a little further forward i.e. not suggesting this initial
>>small step should be transformed into a larger step but rather looking
>>at what the ne
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> PS: the specific svn revisions here are not the central point, the
> point is the lack of any discussion/scrutiny on any of these followed
> by the self-fulfilling prophecy: "To be released the code must be
> clean. Releasing imply a de
>-Original Message-
>From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 7:24 AM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Shepherds for podling reports
>
>On 2 May 2012 10:19, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Ross G
>-Original Message-
>From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 4:54 AM
>To: general
>Subject: Shepherds for podling reports
>
>Hi,
>
>In order to better share the effort of reviewing podling reports and
>giving constructive feedback where needed, I'
On 2 May 2012 10:19, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> This is a good idea. I have signed up.
>
> Excellent, thanks!
>
>> I only ask you bear one thing in mind. Some months active people here
>> have lots of their own podlings reporting, whic
The Apache MRUnit team is pleased to announce the release of MRUnit
0.9.0-incubating from the Apache Incubator.
This is the fourth release of Apache MRUnit, a Java library that helps
developers unit test Apache Hadoop map reduce jobs.
The release is available here:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/close
Hi,
this is the first Apache Stanbol (incubating) release. Please vote for releasing
*Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating*
The RC7 for this release has passed our PPMC vote and we already have
three binding +1 votes from IPMC members. The PPMC vote thread can be
found here
http://markmail.org/thread
Hi,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> This is a good idea. I have signed up.
Excellent, thanks!
> I only ask you bear one thing in mind. Some months active people here
> have lots of their own podlings reporting, which takes quite a bit of time
> if done diligently. When as
Jukka,
This is a good idea. I have signed up. I only ask you bear one thing
in mind. Some months active people here have lots of their own
podlings reporting, which takes quite a bit of time if done
diligently. When assigning shepherd each month please bear in mind how
many reports they are alread
Hi,
In order to better share the effort of reviewing podling reports and
giving constructive feedback where needed, I'd like to propose
something like the shepherd model the ASF board is using for project
reports. For each report a single "shepherd" [*] is assigned
responsibility for a deeper revi
Hi,
I need write access to the incubator Wiki.
My Wiki user name is: Fabian Christ
My Apache user is: fchrist
Best,
- Fabian
--
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache
27 matches
Mail list logo
