David Crossley wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > The Incubator ReportingSchedule needs better management.
> >
> > At the moment it is manually maintained.
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
> >
> > Podlings are expected to manage their entry.
> > Add to it when they ente
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi
wrote:
>>Robert Burrell Donkin said:
>>[...] Self-organising communities are only sustainable with a big
> enough population.
>
> I would also add that "enough" is a relative measure. Maybe (just maybe)
> for empiredb "enough" is 5.
For projects
>Robert Burrell Donkin said:
>[...] Self-organising communities are only sustainable with a big
enough population.
I would also add that "enough" is a relative measure. Maybe (just maybe)
for empiredb "enough" is 5.
Ciao,
R
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> "Some" d00d
"Some" d00d, not "all". Not every healthy Apache project
needs to be a massive java experiment in social engineering.
Diversity is a good thing.
>
>From: Robert Burrell Donkin
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 5:28 PM
>Subject: R
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi
wrote:
> Perhaps I'm biased here (and I'm also an ASF newbie), but, coming from many
> one-band-man projects I feel "5 diverse, active and regular committers"
> that can keep their user base happy is more than enough to be described as
> a succesf
Perhaps I'm biased here (and I'm also an ASF newbie), but, coming from many
one-band-man projects I feel "5 diverse, active and regular committers"
that can keep their user base happy is more than enough to be described as
a succesful project. Just my 2 cents.
Regards,
Raffaele
On Mon, Oct 31
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Rainer Döbele wrote:
>>> ...Certainly there is no way for us to compete with projects like
>>> Subversion or Open Office and there is
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Rainer Döbele wrote:
>> ...Certainly there is no way for us to compete with projects like Subversion
>> or Open Office and there is no way for us to ever get there.
>> But I hope that it is not only
I don't think it's a blocker. We've got all of the other pieces correct
(headers, license, no category X libraries, etc). Having something
published into the repository will help us greatly. Plus it is already
fixed in svn, and hopefully we'll have a quicker turn around for the
next release.
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> Please vote on the release candidate for Apache Droids Incubating, version
> 0.1-incubating. I've received two binding IPMC +1 votes and 4 non-binding +1
> votes. The blockers identified by Marvin and sebb should be fixed in t
Given it is an incubator release and some stuff is not "perfect" yet,
I'll give my +1 even when this is not really nice. From the formal
point of view this all is ok to me. And as long as the source code is
there (and people have a chance to test it with your workaround).
Please cancel this vote o
Turns out, there's a bug in th version buildnumber-maven-plugin that we
use that is causing it to fail.
We mark the jar manifests with svn versions, and that is what is
failing. Commenting the plugin out, or changing it to version 1.0 works
just fine.
Other projects are using that same build
Thorsten Scherler wrote on Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 14:09:17 +0100:
> On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 08:25 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> > Don't worry about it. Your vote and my vote carry over from the dev list.
> > We're in need of a third binding vote from the IPMC.
>
> Please, somebody, we are waiting fo
I currently look at it. Everything looks good so far, but when running
mvn test I get an error:
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
[INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
/Users/cg/release-checking/droids-0.1.0-incubating && svn
--non-interac
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 08:25 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> Don't worry about it. Your vote and my vote carry over from the dev list.
> We're in need of a third binding vote from the IPMC.
Please, somebody, we are waiting for this release and suffering in the
community because devs hold back they
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:50 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 10/30/2011 8:05 PM, David Crossley wrote:
>> Benson Margulies wrote:
>>> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Thinking out load: perhaps just promote the project into a TLP, while
having a few IPMC members volunteer to become PMC memb
+1
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> fyi - we already have one binding +1 (Benson) vote from our PMC vote
> round so we need one more +1
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Thomas Fox wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> -
fyi - we already have one binding +1 (Benson) vote from our PMC vote
round so we need one more +1
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Thomas Fox wrote:
> +1
>
> Thomas
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator
+1
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
19 matches
Mail list logo
