> we could share MLs and also SVN (Sandbox
> would be nice, not?)
MLs are fine, b/c one would need to change address later, and
searching for pre-graduation threads is more easily.
For SVN I don't see a benefit. The repos can be moved with less effort
once component is graduated. I would like to
Hi Henri!
thanks for following up the conversation! I agree that joining the
existing Commons infra would simplify the process to graduate OGNL as
a proper Commons component, we could share MLs and also SVN (Sandbox
would be nice, not?)
What Incubator PMCs think about it?
Simo
http://people.apache
Below is a thread from the Commons Dev list in which I'm recommending
that OGNL use the commons dev mailing list and that the svn
permissions allow the ognl committers and the commons committers to
have read write access.
http://commons.markmail.org/thread/ku3ouuilpiicb5is
Is this a concern f
+1 for the proposal. I would like to contribute to this project.
Thanks
Milinda
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to propose Airavata for entry into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The full proposal can be found at [1] and is copied at the end of this
> mail. For tho
The Apache Bean Validation [1] community is proud to announce our
0.3-incubating release, which is our third release as an Apache
Incubator project. This release includes a few minor bug fixes and
passes the Bean Validation 1.0.3 TCK. Please visit the Downloads [2],
Documentation [3] and Samples [4
Hi,
I think this would be a good move going forward.In addition to points
Glen and Srinath raised also Airavata has a significant stake in So
going forWS-Messenger in terms of monitoring of long workflows across
resource boundaries as well as the components being orchestrated.
Going forward it wil
+1 for the proposal.
Deepal
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to propose Airavata for entry into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The full proposal can be found at [1] and is copied at the end of this mail.
> For those in a hurry here's a quick summary:
>
> Airavata is
Hi Glen,
There is a slight difference between Savan and messenger as one let
you subscribe to event generated by services whereas other is a
broker. Still I agree that messenger is best placed inside Savan.
I would like to propose that we bring in ws-messenger into Airavata
and move it off before
I am pleased to announce the availability of Apache Deltacloud 0.3.0.
Apache Deltacloud is a RESTful cloud abstraction API. The release
consists both of the API server and a Ruby client.
The release can be found at
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/deltacloud/0.3.0/ Gems and RPM's
for Fedora w
On 28/04/2011 23:21, Glen Daniels wrote:
Hi Ross, all,
I think in general this looks great and I'd definitely +1 bringing
Airavata to the Incubator.
The only point I'd explore a bit is the WS-Messenger component, in
particular whether this bit might (either now or eventually) want to end
up in
On 28/04/2011 23:23, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
I'd be +1 to mentor and help see that outcome through.
Please feel free to add yourself to the mentor list Chris.
Great to have you on board.
Ross
Cheers,
Chris
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 28, 2011, at 1:10 PM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
I'd be +1 to mentor and help see that outcome through.
Cheers,
Chris
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 28, 2011, at 1:10 PM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:
> On 23 Apr 2011, at 23:16, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Looks great and sounds very complimentary to OODT. Happy that you gu
Hi Ross, all,
I think in general this looks great and I'd definitely +1 bringing
Airavata to the Incubator.
The only point I'd explore a bit is the WS-Messenger component, in
particular whether this bit might (either now or eventually) want to end
up in the Axis project, since it seems like
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 13:49 +0200, Michal Fojtik wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:20 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
>
> > The vote resulted in 8 +1, no 0's or -1's; two +1 votes were cast by
> > mentors (Carl and Jim)
> >
> > With that, the release of Deltacloud 0.3.0 RC3 is approved and I'll move
> >
Hi Chris,
Justin Erenkrantz previously (almost a year ago) pointed us to OODT and found
it very complementary. Very Excited that Ross is involved with both projects
and hoping for a good alignment. I tried the OODT 0.1 release but haven't
looked at the 0.2 release yet. Briefly skimming though t
On 28 Apr 2011, at 20:45, Sagara Gunathunga wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> +1 and I would like to contribute for this project.
Excellent. We look forward to working with you.
Ross
>
> Thanks !
>
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> I would like to propose Airavata for entry
On 23 Apr 2011, at 23:16, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Looks great and sounds very complimentary to OODT. Happy that you guys
> mention alignment -- might be nice to expose data from an OODT file
> management+workflow management+resource management system as a Airavata
>
Hi Ross,
+1 and I would like to contribute for this project.
Thanks !
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to propose Airavata for entry into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The full proposal can be found at [1] and is copied at the end of this mail.
> For those in a h
On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:20 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
> The vote resulted in 8 +1, no 0's or -1's; two +1 votes were cast by
> mentors (Carl and Jim)
>
> With that, the release of Deltacloud 0.3.0 RC3 is approved and I'll move
> the artifacts to the proper place to make them the GA.
Excellent new
hi just a sidenote: it's always a good idea to use the apache written versions
of JSR APIs. You can find them in
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 4/28/11, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> From: Edward J. Yoon
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Hama ver
Then, should I open new vote thread?
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your review. I am writing down all advices you gave me on
> our project wiki.
>
> I'll fix that issue and make RC4 soon.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Stefan Seelman
Hi,
Thanks for your review. I am writing down all advices you gave me on
our project wiki.
I'll fix that issue and make RC4 soon.
Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> Hi Edward,
>
> first sorry for the late response.
>
> - checksums and signature are ok
> - rat-che
Hi Edward,
first sorry for the late response.
- checksums and signature are ok
- rat-check looks ok (CHANGES.txt and conf/groomservers are not
approved, you should add the apache-rat-plugin to your pom.xml)
- Ant and Maven builds worked
- license and notice file looks ok except for the servlet.ja
23 matches
Mail list logo
