Re: Voting waiting period

2011-02-15 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/15/2011 5:33 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. > wrote: >> On 2/12/2011 10:57 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf >>> wrote: Phil Steitz wrote on Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 22:32:24 -0500: > On 2/

Re: Voting waiting period

2011-02-15 Thread Doug Cutting
On 02/15/2011 03:33 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I like it when people not on the committee take > part in votes and I think we should encourage it. As Hen said in "were > in the recruiting business" [1]. My pet peeve is people putting > "binding" on their vote - it tells non-PMC-members "you're vo

Re: Voting waiting period

2011-02-15 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 2/12/2011 10:57 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf >> wrote: >>> Phil Steitz wrote on Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 22:32:24 -0500: On 2/5/11 4:16 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: > Bertrand, >>>

Re: svn commit: r1070961 - /incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/vcl.html

2011-02-15 Thread David Crossley
Please make changes to the source files and then re-generate. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html -David > Author: fapeeler > Date: Tue Feb 15 16:50:18 2011 > New Revision: 1070961 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1070961&view=rev > Log: > > Updated Apache VCL committer lis

Re: Incubator Board Report - February 2011

2011-02-15 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > Hey Bertrand, there has been an update and I sent the updated one. > > The HISE team sent and signed their report on the last moment. Would > you please add the updated one to the board agenda ? I think I got it, please cross-check (I

Re: Incubator Board Report - February 2011

2011-02-15 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Hey Bertrand, there has been an update and I sent the updated one. The HISE team sent and signed their report on the last moment. Would you please add the updated one to the board agenda ? On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Mohammad, > > Thanks for sending the repor

[UPDATE] - Incubator Board Report - February 2011

2011-02-15 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Hi... Update: HISE team submitted and signed their report. Missing reports: None Not yet signed reports: Bluesky - (NOTE: It is not included here as being not signed by their mentors. Notifications have been sent on both general@ and each project's dev@). General Notes: - EasyAnt has been ac

Re: Incubator Board Report - February 2011

2011-02-15 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Mohammad, Thanks for sending the report on behalf of Noel, I have added it to the board agenda. On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: >... Not yet signed reports: Bluesky, HISE - (NOTE: They are not included > here as being not signed by their mentors. Notifications hav

Incubator Board Report - February 2011

2011-02-15 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Hi... Missing reports: None Not yet signed reports: Bluesky, HISE - (NOTE: They are not included here as being not signed by their mentors. Notifications have been sent on both general@ and each project's dev@). General Notes: - EasyAnt has been accepted as a

Re: Missing reports: Bluesky, Deltacloud, HISE, Mesos, Stonehenge

2011-02-15 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
For got to add [1] [1] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2011 On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > Dear *Bluesky* Mentors, the report is already on [1], would anyone of > you please sign it, this is the very last call. > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Moha

Re: Missing reports: Bluesky, Deltacloud, HISE, Mesos, Stonehenge

2011-02-15 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Dear *Bluesky* Mentors, the report is already on [1], would anyone of you please sign it, this is the very last call. On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > Hi... > >   Dear Mentors, all of these reports are still missing from [1]. > Would you please make sure that it is p