Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC1)

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > Hi Luciano, > Apologies for the slow review... Things look good, except for one problem, I > think... > > Source, sigs/checksums, and build all look good. > > I don't like the licensing information in photark-webapp-M3-incubating.war > > First

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator

All, I have volunteered to start the infrastructure set up in the absence of some of the Googlers on vacation as Soren mentions. Hopefully over the next few days we'll get some clarity on the actual logistics of becoming a podling in the incubator. I think we will likely start a new thread to

RE: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator

Welcome, and best of luck. :-) --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator

Michael MacFadden has written some ideas here: http://www.waveprotocol.org/wave-in-a-box/apache-incubator-roadmap FYI, several of us on the Google Wave team are away on vacations in parts of the December-January time period, so anything that depends on us may move a bit slow for the next month or

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator

Would it be a good idea to translate this page to other languages? Or something is more urgent for translation than this? I can try to help. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal 2010/12/3 Dan Peterson > Hi everyone, > > I'm pleased to report that the vote to accept Wave into the ASF i

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator

Now that the Vote has been completed. What are the next steps? On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Tad Glines wrote: > 2010/12/3 Dan Peterson > > The 18 binding votes: >> Andrus Adamchik, Ant Elder, Bernd Fondermann, Bertrand Delacretaz, Chris >> A. Mattmann, Christian Grobmeier, Davanum Srinivas,

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator

2010/12/3 Dan Peterson > The 18 binding votes: > Andrus Adamchik, Ant Elder, Bernd Fondermann, Bertrand Delacretaz, Chris > A. Mattmann, Christian Grobmeier, Davanum Srinivas, Dave Johnson, Doug > Cutting, Emmanuel Lecharny, Jim Jagielski, Kevan Miller, Luciano Resende, Mark > Struberg, Michael M

[RESULTS][VOTE] Wave accepted into the ASF incubator

Hi everyone, I'm pleased to report that the vote to accept Wave into the ASF incubator was overwhelmingly positive. By my tally, there have been 88 votes over the past 3+ days, including 18 IPMC binding votes, 8 votes by members of the ASF, and no -1 votes. Of those 88 votes, due to a slight proc

Ready to propose EXI incubator candidate

This is a call for a champion and mentors for an incubator project we are about to propose formally for implementations of the W3C EXI specification and related technologies. The current proposal abstract, proposal, and background for EXI can be found at the end of this message for reference[4].

Introduction for Stephen D. Williams (sdw)

For the purposes of supporting the about to be proposed EXI incubator project, I'll introduce myself here: I have a long background [3] in software development and related activities. In addition to IETF (presence/IM) and W3C (XBC,EXI) participation for many years, I have long (since the mid-8

Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC1)

Hi Luciano, Apologies for the slow review... Things look good, except for one problem, I think... Source, sigs/checksums, and build all look good. I don't like the licensing information in photark-webapp-M3-incubating.war First, note how there are redundant license files in WEB-INF/classes/LICE

Re: Setting up the Jena podling

On 03/12/10 13:38, Dave wrote: On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > I'm working with the Jena team to get everything ready on their side. > > Thanks for the help on the ASF side. Where are we on ICLAs and user ID preferences? (Perhaps we should move further discussion to

Re: Setting up the Jena podling

On 03/12/10 13:59, Ross Gardler wrote: On 3 Dec 2010, at 13:38, Dave wrote: (Perhaps we should move further discussion to the jena-dev list since it is now open) Yes. I'll get Jena debs to join. Ross Leo already invited us via jena-devel. I imagine most of us are subscribed now. Dam

Re: Setting up the Jena podling

On 3 Dec 2010, at 13:38, Dave wrote: > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >> I'm working with the Jena team to get everything ready on their side. >> >> Thanks for the help on the ASF side. > > Where are we on ICLAs and user ID preferences? I have all the IDs waiting for IC

Re: Setting up the Jena podling

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > I'm working with the Jena team to get everything ready on their side. > > Thanks for the help on the ASF side. Where are we on ICLAs and user ID preferences? (Perhaps we should move further discussion to the jena-dev list since it is now open

Re: Setting up the Jena podling

I'm working with the Jena team to get everything ready on their side. Thanks for the help on the ASF side. Sent from my mobile device. On 3 Dec 2010, at 10:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Dave wrote: >> ...I hope I didn't jump the gun, but I've gone

Re: Setting up the Jena podling

Hi, On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Dave wrote: > ...I hope I didn't jump the gun, but I've gone ahead and created JIRA > issues to request infrastructure setup for Apache Jena (incubating) Thanks - I did the svn setup, for the rest I'm quite busy with the new stanbol podling otherwise, so i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.7-incubating (rc2)

+1 On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > Hi, > > The Apache Empire-db community has approved the 2.0.7-incubating > release and we are now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the > release. *As we only have two mentors left we will need at least one > extra vote.