Re: Discussion: graduating Subversion

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > Before calling for a vote to graduate Subversion, I figured it prudent > to have a discussion first. I believe Subversion is quite ready (and > has been, but the holidays and whatnot kept me from sending this > earlier). > > Any thoughts on why

Re: Discussion: graduating Subversion

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 17:21, Craig L Russell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Jan 25, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Before calling for a vote to graduate Subversion, I figured it prudent >> to have a discussion first. I believe Subversion is quite ready (and >> has been, but th

Re: Discussion: graduating Subversion

Hi Greg, On Jan 25, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote: Hi all, Before calling for a vote to graduate Subversion, I figured it prudent to have a discussion first. I believe Subversion is quite ready (and has been, but the holidays and whatnot kept me from sending this earlier). Any thoughts

Discussion: graduating Subversion

Hi all, Before calling for a vote to graduate Subversion, I figured it prudent to have a discussion first. I believe Subversion is quite ready (and has been, but the holidays and whatnot kept me from sending this earlier). Any thoughts on why Subversion should NOT graduate now? Thanks, -g -

Re: Web site updates

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Thanks, Justin.  I appreciate the work that you just committed.  Looked > reasonable to me.  I hope that others have also reviewed it. I certainly don't intend for any of my changes to alter policy - just make some wording clearer to n00b

Web site updates

Thanks, Justin. I appreciate the work that you just committed. Looked reasonable to me. I hope that others have also reviewed it. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additi

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.3.0-rc9

Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > Gav... wrote: >> Having licenses in place for all source files (not generated) and/or >> exclusions I should think would be a requirement for release approval, I'd >> prefer others to clarify that though. > > I think it's a good practic

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.3.0-rc9

Gav... wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Eddie Epstein [mailto:eaepst...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Sunday, 24 January 2010 11:52 PM >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.3.0-rc9 >> >> Hi, sure. >> The unapproved licenses for each package are: >> >> L