Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Ace into the Incubator

2009-04-19 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
> [X ]  +1, bring Ace into Incubator -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Commons issues WAS RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

2009-04-19 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Santiago Gala wrote: > I feel happy that TLPs have to exercise judgement calls. They decide if > a small component is appropriate, the incubator handles IP clearance > oversight and they adopt the one/two committers, handing community > oversight. What is wrong? i

Re: Commons issues WAS RE: [PROPOSAL] Commons Incubator

2009-04-19 Thread Santiago Gala
El vie, 17-04-2009 a las 10:41 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin escribió: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > > > >> * IPMC informally agrees that the opinion of any TLP prospectively > >> admitting a graduating podlin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pivot 1.1 (second try)

2009-04-19 Thread Santiago Gala
El vie, 17-04-2009 a las 16:22 -0700, Upayavira escribió: > On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 10:48 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:07 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > > As far as I know, putting a file in a publicly accessible SVN > > > repository is considered as distribution too. > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Ace into the Incubator

2009-04-19 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: > Please vote on accepting Apache Ace for incubation at the Apache > Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message > and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AceProposal. We > ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor i

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Ace into the Incubator

2009-04-19 Thread Niall Pemberton
+1 Niall On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Karl Pauls wrote: > Please vote on accepting Apache Ace for incubation at the Apache > Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message > and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AceProposal. We > ask the Incubator PMC t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Ace into the Incubator

2009-04-19 Thread Richard S. Hall
+1 -> richard On 4/19/09 11:35 AM, Karl Pauls wrote: Please vote on accepting Apache Ace for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AceProposal. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it,

Help reviewing PhotArk podling release

2009-04-19 Thread Luciano Resende
Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery application including a content repository for the images, a display piece, an access control layer, and upload capabilities. The idea is to have a rigid design for the content repository with a very flexible display piece. The images in t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Ace into the Incubator

2009-04-19 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > +1, bring Ace into Incubator +1 -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug --

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Ace into the Incubator

2009-04-19 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
+1, bring Ace into Incubator Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Accept Apache Ace into the Incubator

2009-04-19 Thread Karl Pauls
Please vote on accepting Apache Ace for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AceProposal. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with Karl as the Champion, and Carsten, Niclas and Bertra

Re: [DISCUSS] Sanselan as a Commons library

2009-04-19 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 18.04.2009 22:03:53 Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Hi, Craig, > > I'm personally not sure that commons would be the best fit for > Sanselan. Despite the name, I'd consider the commons of xmlgraphics > (despite the name, this is not only about XML) a better place. I thought along similar lines but th