Re: ** MISSING ** February Incubator Reports

2009-02-18 Thread David Crossley
Noel J. Bergman wrote: > reports: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2009 > > Nothing for Cassandra, Droids, Lokahi, Pivot, VCL, or WSRP4J. XAP and > Stonehenge really should have had more to say. I am concerned about Cassandra. They are new to the Incubator, but we have not received any r

Re: remember when each project report is due

2009-02-18 Thread David Crossley
Craig L Russell wrote: > > Thanks for making Clutch and extending it to make it even better. [ snip ] Thanks for your feedback. Keep it coming. > What I was thinking is to have email lists generated for each podling, > so email could be sent out to the people who care. > > For example, in htt

Re: IP clearance and copyright transfer

2009-02-18 Thread Bill Stoddard
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: I was looking at: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html It seems to imply that we require copyright transfer as part of the IP clearance process. Since when do we require copyright transfer?? I thought we only require a license. Sanji

Re: remember when each project report is due

2009-02-18 Thread David Crossley
sebb wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > > > e.g. cat report_due_2.txt > > BlueSky Cassandra Droids ESME Kato Lokahi PDFBox PhotArk Pivot Sling > > Stonehenge VCL WSRP4J XAP > > [from the peanut gallery:] > > AFAICS that format will be problematical should a podling have one or > more spaces in

Re: February 2009 Incubator Board Report

2009-02-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 18, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Thorsten Scherler wrote: On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 13:56 -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote: The last month has been fairly quite, with nothing currently requiring the attention of the Board. ... = Droids = ** DID NOT REPORT ** Awfully sorry about that but I could ha

Re: February 2009 Incubator Board Report

2009-02-18 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 13:56 -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > The last month has been fairly quite, with nothing currently requiring the > attention of the Board. ... > = Droids = > > ** DID NOT REPORT ** > Awfully sorry about that but I could have sworn we did not had to report. ATM Droids is q

[VOTE] [RESULT] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click - third try

2009-02-18 Thread Bob Schellink
Hi all, The vote ends with the following result: 3 +1 and no other votes. +1 Andrus Adamchik +1 Henning Schmiedehausen +1 Will Glass-Husain The vote passes and the distribution will be uploaded to '/dist/incubator/click/' I know folks have been quite busy so really appreciate the time taken

Re: IP clearance and copyright transfer

2009-02-18 Thread Kevan Miller
On Feb 18, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: Hi Craig, These two sentences in that section are what threw me off: "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the package, the core code, and any

Re: IP clearance and copyright transfer

2009-02-18 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
Hi Craig, These two sentences in that section are what threw me off: "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project." "Check and make sure tha

Re: IP clearance and copyright transfer

2009-02-18 Thread Craig L Russell
The only place I found (after a quick review) where you might infer copyright transfer is that there is a section named "Copyright". This could be changed to "License". Are there other places that imply that a copyright grant is required? Craig On Feb 18, 2009, at 8:35 AM, Sanjiva Weerawaran

IP clearance and copyright transfer

2009-02-18 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
I was looking at: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html It seems to imply that we require copyright transfer as part of the IP clearance process. Since when do we require copyright transfer?? I thought we only require a license. Sanjiva. -- Sanjiva Weerawarana,

Re: remember when each project report is due

2009-02-18 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi David, Thanks for making Clutch and extending it to make it even better. On Feb 17, 2009, at 10:41 PM, David Crossley wrote: Okay, Clutch now re-generates those files every time it runs. report_due_1.txt is for group-1 (Jan,Apr,Jul,Oct) report_due_2.txt is for group-2 (Feb,May,Aug,Nov) rep

Re: [VOTE] Suspending Projects -- XAP

2009-02-18 Thread Bob Buffone
Hello PMC, As a committer on the XAP Project, I would also vote +1 (non binding of course) for moving the project from incubation to the attic. We have seen little community develop around the project and have been making little/no progress on the code lately. Thanks for everyones help throughout

Re: remember when each project report is due

2009-02-18 Thread sebb
On 18/02/2009, David Crossley wrote: > Upayavira wrote: > > David Crossley wrote: > > > Upayavira wrote: > > > > David Crossley wrote: > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html > > > > > > > > Could clutch in some way be used to mimic Marvin for the Incubator? > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Apache Click - third try

2009-02-18 Thread Andrus Adamchik
+1 On Feb 10, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Bob Schellink wrote: New snapshots are available with the following changes: # build.properties has new property to switch off the hibernate dependency # build.xml will only build the hibernate package if hibernate is available on the build path # The Co

Re: Suspending Projects

2009-02-18 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 2/18/09, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Niclas Hedhman >> wrote: > >>> The inertia is enormous, and I personally think that only a drastic, >>> disruptive change of the codebase (i.e. a ver 3.0, simi