Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Velocity-Tiles integration, need for someone to process the request

2008-10-23 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Antonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear all, > I am Antonio Petrelli, PMC member of the Apache Tiles project. > We would like to process the IP Clearance for the Velocity-Tiles > integration, whose ZIP file containing the code and the IP clearance > template are

[jira] Created: (INCUBATOR-98) Request Confluence from Infra

2008-10-23 Thread Niclas Hedhman (JIRA)
Request Confluence from Infra - Key: INCUBATOR-98 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-98 Project: Incubator Issue Type: Sub-task Reporter: Niclas Hedhman First step is to create a Co

Re: Next steps for droids

2008-10-23 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 08:00 +1100, David Crossley wrote: ... > You need to do the "Acceptance" steps. I added you to the > "Reporting Schedule" a while ago. The next step is to > add your "Status page". There are links to the relevant > docs about that at the second paragraph of > http://incubator.

Re: What's up with WSRP4J?

2008-10-23 Thread Ate Douma
David Sean Taylor wrote: On Oct 23, 2008, at 6:54 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: That is a very good question. I do know that we did a portal evaluation earlier this year and every vendor was planning on having WSRP 2.0 support during this year. The spec was finally approved this year. I seem to re

Re: Next steps for droids

2008-10-23 Thread David Crossley
Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > >like pointed out in the other mail the next things for droids is to > >move > >svn, move the issues and setup the mailing lists. > > > >I reckon I will need to write to infrastructure to ask for help, > >right? > > > >Regarding the svn mo

Re: What's up with WSRP4J?

2008-10-23 Thread David Sean Taylor
On Oct 23, 2008, at 6:54 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: That is a very good question. I do know that we did a portal evaluation earlier this year and every vendor was planning on having WSRP 2.0 support during this year. The spec was finally approved this year. I seem to recall the OASIS site had

Re: Next steps for droids

2008-10-23 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Oct 23, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Thorsten Scherler wrote: Hi all, like pointed out in the other mail the next things for droids is to move svn, move the issues and setup the mailing lists. I reckon I will need to write to infrastructure to ask for help, right? Regarding the svn move I woul

Next steps for droids

2008-10-23 Thread Thorsten Scherler
Hi all, like pointed out in the other mail the next things for droids is to move svn, move the issues and setup the mailing lists. I reckon I will need to write to infrastructure to ask for help, right? Regarding the svn move I would like to ask one of the mentors (Ross, Paul or Grant) do do ste

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Velocity-Tiles integration, need for someone to process the request

2008-10-23 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Antonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear all, hi antonio > I am Antonio Petrelli, PMC member of the Apache Tiles project. > We would like to process the IP Clearance for the Velocity-Tiles > integration, whose ZIP file containing the code and the IP clearance >

Re: What's up with WSRP4J?

2008-10-23 Thread Ralph Goers
That is a very good question. I do know that we did a portal evaluation earlier this year and every vendor was planning on having WSRP 2.0 support during this year. The spec was finally approved this year. I seem to recall the OASIS site had links to the encumbrances. I can't find them now.

Re: [Proposal] Kato - mentors needed etc

2008-10-23 Thread ant elder
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Steve Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > A couple of weeks ago I posted the existence of a draft proposal for a new > project. > (For those of you who missed it it's here -> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KatoProposal) > > I've only had one comment so far, so I'

Re: What's up with WSRP4J?

2008-10-23 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
I don't know what the exact status is, but David (our portals pmc chair) was following up on this. I'm including [EMAIL PROTECTED] as portals is the sponsor of this project. Carsten Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > According to clutch, WSRP4J has been incubating for 1876 days... > > Did not

[jira] Resolved: (INCUBATOR-97) Submission of CCLAs for initial committers

2008-10-23 Thread Niclas Hedhman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Niclas Hedhman resolved INCUBATOR-97. - Resolution: Fixed Since all ICLAs are on file, I am closing this issue. I still recomme

[jira] Closed: (INCUBATOR-97) Submission of CCLAs for initial committers

2008-10-23 Thread Niclas Hedhman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Niclas Hedhman closed INCUBATOR-97. --- > Submission of CCLAs for initial committers > -- > >

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-97) Submission of CCLAs for initial committers

2008-10-23 Thread Niclas Hedhman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12642091#action_12642091 ] Niclas Hedhman commented on INCUBATOR-97: - I have been corrected by William Rowe