Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease

2008-09-19 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 10:29 +0200, Thomas Fischer wrote: > @Henning: the thread is > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200809.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] Well, IMHO you simply erred on the servlet-api / jsp-api thing (empire-db, as an AL 2.0 licensed project is obviously f

Re: [VOTE] Accept VCL into Apache Incbator

2008-09-19 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
[X] +1 Accept VCL into Incubator -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] VCL: Virtual Computing Lab

2008-09-19 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I knew a VOTE thread would stimulate folks :) Perhaps Doug can weigh in on this from his perspective. I see there is a difference in that VCL is about supporting multiple smaller systems in a virtualized environment rather than a massive compute kind of arrangement. I think there would li

Re: [VOTE] Accept VCL into Apache Incbator

2008-09-19 Thread Matt Hogstrom
+1 On Sep 19, 2008, at 12:36 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: This item has been out for discussion for a few weeks. Please indicate your preference for accepting VCL to the Incubator. Proposal is included below for posterity. We're looking for a few more mentors. If there is discussion please

Re: [PROPOSAL] Catacomb

2008-09-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 1:55 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a proposal to enter the incubator. > > See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CatacombProposal for the most > up-to-date version. Nifty! > As Champion we have Gianugo Rabellino from the > ASF. > > We look forward to comments a

Re: status of PGP support in Maven

2008-09-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about we include the signatures in the source distros? That way > if you trust your source, then you can trust the dependencies it > downloads. Eww. That'd be a giant gaping security hole. -- justin ---

Re: [PROPOSAL] VCL: Virtual Computing Lab

2008-09-19 Thread Matthieu Riou
Sorry for waking up only now. Before voting I'd like to know how this poddling would compare to Tashi (see [1]). Sounds to me like there would be a lot of common ground, no? Thanks, Matthieu [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TashiProposal On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Matt Hogstrom <[EMA

Re: [VOTE] Accept VCL into Apache Incbator

2008-09-19 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
+1 Regards, Alan On Sep 18, 2008, at 9:36 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: This item has been out for discussion for a few weeks. Please indicate your preference for accepting VCL to the Incubator. Proposal is included below for posterity. We're looking for a few more mentors. If there is di

Re: status of PGP support in Maven

2008-09-19 Thread Hiram Chirino
How about we include the signatures in the source distros? That way if you trust your source, then you can trust the dependencies it downloads. On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sep 17, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > >> The only

Re: header notices for mirrors a.o/dist/incubator

2008-09-19 Thread Simon Laws
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You spelled artifacts wrong: > Verify downloaded artefacts > other than that, looks good. > > Looks like a couple of graduated projects (cxf and tuscany) might want to > consider removing their incubator artifacts (they ar

Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease

2008-09-19 Thread Thomas Fischer
> In fact the jars we had in our struts2-ext 1.0.3 release candidate > were taken from Tomcat 5.5. The manifest says: > >Manifest-Version: 1.0 >Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.6.5 >Created-By: 1.4.2_11-b06 (Sun Microsystems Inc.) > >Name: javax/servlet/ >Specification-Title: Java A

[PROPOSAL] Catacomb

2008-09-19 Thread markus.litz
This is a proposal to enter the incubator. See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CatacombProposal for the most up-to-date version. As Champion we have Gianugo Rabellino from the ASF. We look forward to comments and discussion. -Markus = Catacomb Proposal = == Abstract == Catacomb is a Web

Re: [Proposal] Kato : draft Incubator project proposal posted

2008-09-19 Thread Steve Poole
Hi Dims - There is every interest in developing these sorts of tools. We plan to create useful example tools that will show how to use the API There is some existing tooling in the code that we get from IBM but we will be adding more. I loosely classify the diagnostic tools space in two ways

Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease

2008-09-19 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Uh, what? AFAIK they are under AL 2.0. It would be absurd if we could not distribute jars taken from other Apache releases. Can you point me at the vote thread with the rejection? Ciao Henning On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 09:13 +0200, Rainer Döbele wrote: > Hi Henning, > > In fa

Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease

2008-09-19 Thread Rainer Döbele
Hi Henning, In fact the jars we had in our struts2-ext 1.0.3 release candidate were taken from Tomcat 5.5. The manifest says: Manifest-Version: 1.0 Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.6.5 Created-By: 1.4.2_11-b06 (Sun Microsystems Inc.) Name: javax/servlet/ Specifi