On 8/18/08, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Jukka Zitting
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We're again missing reports from some incubating projects.
>>
>> I'd be very interested in seeing a report at least from BlueSky.
>>
>> JSecurity is just
I may have missed some of the threads on this, so apologize if this is a
repeat. However, FWIW, I wanted to confirm that Etch isn't registered as a
trademark or service mark with the US PTO for any software product or
service, so there is no direct conflict with names in that venue.
Jennifer
On
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're again missing reports from some incubating projects.
>
> I'd be very interested in seeing a report at least from BlueSky.
>
> JSecurity is just starting and there seems to be some life in WSRP4J,
> but Lokahi
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 03:59:43PM +0100, ant elder wrote:
>> I'd be wary of doing that if i was you. Whether or not it means the same
>> thing legally this is clearly specified in ASF policy at
>> http://www.apache.org/legal
It was suggested that the committer list be trimmed to those who will
actually be committing (perhaps the 8 that Scott mentions). Those
suggestions were not even acknowledged. Is there a problem with
trimming the list?
-Yonik
-
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 12:33 -0500, James Dixson wrote:
> It seems discussion has died down a bit.
>
> So to wrap up on the last issues discussed:
>
> I think we should just keep the name. We have quite a bit of goodwill
> invested in the name already and it is certainly no worse than other names
I am quite happy to be a mentor and help out with the project on a voluntary
basis.
I have gone through the mill with Apache Qpid and to a certain extent with
Synapse/Axis2/Tuscany, so familiar with the process.
However I have to note that I have an affiliation with the University of
Toronto's Mid
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
We're again missing reports from some incubating projects.
I'd be very interested in seeing a report at least from BlueSky.
I'll write something up.
Bill
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
It seems discussion has died down a bit.
So to wrap up on the last issues discussed:
I think we should just keep the name. We have quite a bit of goodwill
invested in the name already and it is certainly no worse than other names
that have been accepted into incubation. So unless there is a dire
This is a proposal to enter Poloka in to the incubator.
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PolokaProposal
We do not have a champion at the moment.
We are looking forward to the community input.
Cheers
Serge Mankovski
--
= POLOKA Project Proposal =
== Abstract ==
Poloka will b
The derby-dev list is trying to figure what to do with a contribution
that is being offered by two students:
http://www.nabble.com/Apache-Derby-Management-Tool-td18931716.html#a18931716
The students have written a GUI tool for administering Derby databases
and servers. There is some concern tha
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 03:59:43PM +0100, ant elder wrote:
> I'd be wary of doing that if i was you. Whether or not it means the same
> thing legally this is clearly specified in ASF policy at
> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice and if you change from
> that you may find some othe
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:03:05AM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> Neither version contains the text:
>
> This product includes software developed at
> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>
> Which is required per policy.
Yes, I was a little too eager with my commit. I have backed
Neither version contains the text:
This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
Which is required per policy.
Dan
On Monday 18 August 2008 7:08:01 am Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> CouchDB's current notice file looks like:
>
> http:/
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> CouchDB's current notice file looks like:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE
>
> This matches Apache httpd's NOTICE file:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/NO
Hi Jukka,
Thanks for the reminder. The draft report for JSecurity has been
posted to the wiki. I'll update it if needed after review.
Craig
On Aug 17, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
We're again missing reports from some incubating projects.
I'd be very interested in seeing a
Looks good to me, go ahead.
On Aug 18, 2008, at 7:08 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
Hello,
CouchDB's current notice file looks like:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE
This matches Apache httpd's NOTICE file:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/NOTICE
S
I believe it should be ok. Go for it!
-- dims
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> CouchDB's current notice file looks like:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE
>
> This matches Apache httpd's NOTICE file:
>
> http:/
Hello,
CouchDB's current notice file looks like:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE
This matches Apache httpd's NOTICE file:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/NOTICE
So that our NOTICE file matches our other source documentation:
http://svn.ap
Please any comments. :)
Thanks, Ed
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Hama team will use the hudson system.
>
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hama-patch/
>
> BTW, It seems I have no permission to enable remote API calls on JIRA.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Edward J. Yoon updated INCUBATOR-81:
Attachment: INCUBATOR-81.patch
Attaching the patch
> Update the Hama incubation status
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
