Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 8:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Follow-on releases can similarly be built from code checked into the
Apache repository. They just cannot be called "Apache anything". And
On Jul 25, 2008, at 8:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Some things to consider in this discussion:
- The 0.9.0 release cannot be performed off of the c
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Some things to consider in this discussion:
- The 0.9.0 release cannot be performed off of the copy in ASF
- The 0.9.0 or earlier releases cannot be suppo
On Jul 25, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Some things to consider in this discussion:
- The 0.9.0 release cannot be performed off of the copy in ASF
- The 0.9.0 or earlier releases cannot be supported off of the copy
i
Hi Alan,
On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Some things to consider in this discussion:
- The 0.9.0 release cannot be performed off of the copy in ASF
- The 0.9.0 or earlier releases cannot be supported off of the copy
in ASF
Maybe that's what everyone is thinking. I just
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
To be clear: I don't want to be a road block here, I just like to have
these questions discussed before incubation begins; nothing is worse
than having Tashi in incubation for a few months, having them started a
community at Apache and then finding out that there are
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Doug Cutting wrote:
I would expect that Tashi would use Xen command-line programs, not link
directly to Xen's C API's.
Why?
Mostly because I don't know what I'm talking about, and I don't think we
need to resolve this at this point on this list and I'm trying to make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry for the noise - I neglected to include the Incubating notice in my
previous email; it is appended at the bottom of this note.
The Apache UIMA team is pleased to announce the first release of the UIMA-AS
add-on for UIMA. (The release number i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Apache UIMA team is pleased to announce the first release of the UIMA-AS
add-on for UIMA. (The release number is 2.2.2-incubating to correspond with the
base UIMA level).
UIMA-AS adds a highly flexible, robust, and easy to use scaleout capabilit
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 19:22 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Now that raises an interesting question ... if we define our own vendor
> > neutral, Apache licensed, interface definition, are we allowed to host the
> > source for our own implementation of it that is in
Cool, thanks very much!
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> All set.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
>
> Alan, has this been resolved for JSecurity?
>>
>> I visit http://incubator.apache.org/projects/jsecuri
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 19:22 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
>
> > XEN e.g. is GPLv2 licensed and you can not host any code at Apache that
> > needs to be linked with XEN.
>
> Now that raises an interesting question ... if we define our own vendor
> neutral, Apache l
12 matches
Mail list logo
