Santiago Gala wrote:
> > > - publishing lots of repositories helps surfacing patches that are
> > > currently hidden until ready for sending/committing
> > The last one is almost antithetical to how we want people to work.
> Can you elaborate on how is publishing what currently is hidden
> "anti
Endre Stølsvik wrote:
> I find the decision to use one single SVN repo for the entire
> organization's source pretty strange. I'd believe that one repo
> for every TLP
Been there, done that, have the scars.
> The only downside I see is a slight bit more configuration management
Don't be so bli
El mar, 19-02-2008 a las 22:29 +0100, Endre Stølsvik escribió:
> Upayavira wrote:
> > Justin put it very well in a related thread elsewhere (permission
> > sought):
>
> [ CHOP interesting adamant view from Justin ]
> (Where is "elsewhere", btw?)
>
the discussion spread to a private list outside
We have a new vote going on to release NMaven 0.15-incubating. I've
addressed most of the issues raised in the last vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rather than serializing the votes across the PPMC and the IPMC again, I'd
like to just have one vote.
You can find the ongoing vote here:
http://www.nabble.
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 22:29 +0100, Endre Stølsvik wrote:
> Upayavira wrote:
> > Justin put it very well in a related thread elsewhere (permission
> > sought):
>
> [ CHOP interesting adamant view from Justin ]
> (Where is "elsewhere", btw?)
Apache has a number of "internal" lists on which members
Upayavira wrote:
Justin put it very well in a related thread elsewhere (permission
sought):
[ CHOP interesting adamant view from Justin ]
(Where is "elsewhere", btw?)
What I find strange in all this is the view that ALL projects at Apache
would have to change to OtherSCM if one project would
+1
On 2/19/08, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We held a vote on cxf-dev to grant commit karma to Bharath Ganesh in
> recognition of his many valuable contributions:
>
> Thread:
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Bharath-Ganesh-for-committer-to15511330.html
>
> We ended up with 13 +1 vo
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:51 +0100, Endre Stølsvik wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > On Feb 18, 2008 10:48 AM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> outright FUD? Sorry but I don't think there is Fear, Uncertainty or
> >> Doubt in this thread. There are several testimonies of good exper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 from me.
- -- dims
Daniel Kulp wrote:
| We held a vote on cxf-dev to grant commit karma to Bharath Ganesh in
| recognition of his many valuable contributions:
|
| Thread:
| http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Bharath-Ganesh-for-committer-to15511330.
We held a vote on cxf-dev to grant commit karma to Bharath Ganesh in
recognition of his many valuable contributions:
Thread:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Bharath-Ganesh-for-committer-to15511330.html
We ended up with 13 +1 votes, but only 2 (right now, gnodet and bsnyder)
are IPMC binding.
On 19/02/2008, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One topic from the tuscany-user discussion that's worth exposing here
> is whether the NNY project would be a "pure RI" with no extensions
> beyond the spec, or a vehicle for innovation to extend the specs, as
> both Tuscany SCA and SDO hav
Endre Stølsvik wrote:
Why should this discussion be moved into a Apache-private realm, and
not just stay fully public, so that I can watch the proceedings? This
is an interesting discussion.
Can we please keep the Incubator ML focused ???
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008 10:48 AM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
outright FUD? Sorry but I don't think there is Fear, Uncertainty or
Doubt in this thread. There are several testimonies of good experiences
I feel there has been lots of FUD and if you don't realize tha
Paul Querna wrote:
Santiago Gala wrote:
El dom, 17-02-2008 a las 19:02 -0500, Noel J. Bergman escribió:
No. This is the wrong forum. What we've said here is that there
won't be any deviation from the ASF infrastructure for source
control; changing ASF infrastructure is out of scope for the I
14 matches
Mail list logo
