The wording in the Policy was deliberately non-procedural, as the
Incubator PMC decided that policy belongs in the policy document and
process belongs elsewhere. So as far as I'm concerned, this discussion
is not supposed to have an answer.
So Bill's analysis is as valid as anyone else's. I
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
the IPMC votes on a proposal including the names of nominated Mentors.
one of the proposed Mentors must be an Apache member. the others MUST
be members of the IPMC.
are we saying that:
either A) as a result of the proposal vote, nominated Mentors are
drafted on th
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > > > 1. IIRC mentors are drafted onto the IPMC. do i recall correctly?
> > > Yep, although that's subject to a vote so they could be rejected.
Unless
> > > they're members.
> >
> > Not quite entirely accurate. As a matter of Incubator PMC p
On Jan 13, 2008 10:47 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 1. IIRC mentors are drafted onto the IPMC. do i recall correctly?
> > Yep, although that's subject to a vote so they could be rejected. Unless
> > they're members.
>
> Not quite entirely accurate. As a matter of Incubator P
On Jan 14, 2008, at 12:38 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
Incubator PMC:
The River community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
River 2.1.1 incubating. This is the first release from our project.
We would
like to request permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
release on
the Ri
