Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.1-incubator

2007-08-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
Robert, Thanks for the review, comments inline. On Tuesday 07 August 2007 17:34, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On 8/6/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new > > patch release of Apache CXF. > > question > -- > i note that boun

Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.1-incubator

2007-08-07 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 8/6/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new patch > release of Apache CXF. question -- i note that bouncycastle is shipped. CXF is not listed on http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/. has someone checked on http://www.apache.

[VOTE] Approve the release of Tuscany Java DAS beta1 (1.0-incubating-beta1)

2007-08-07 Thread Luciano Resende
The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java DAS beta1 (1.0-incubating-beta1). The Tuscany dev-list vote thread has passed with 5 binding +1 (1 IPMC binding), 1 non-binding +1 and no -1s. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg20879.html The artifacts, incl

Re: ezmlm stripping Outlook attachments

2007-08-07 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 8/7/07, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > We've had a number of complaints about ezmlm stripping plain text > attachments to posts such as patches sent by Microsoft Outlook. > Other mailers (e.g., Mozilla) don't have this problem. IIRC this was a measure put in place by infrastr

ezmlm stripping Outlook attachments

2007-08-07 Thread Martin Sebor
Hi, We've had a number of complaints about ezmlm stripping plain text attachments to posts such as patches sent by Microsoft Outlook. Other mailers (e.g., Mozilla) don't have this problem. Does anyone have any suggestions for how to deal with it other that to switch to a different mailer? More g