On Apr 30, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Couldn't that be "in EJB and related technologies" ??
Certainly implementing the EJB spec is a constant for the project,
so that description would be adequate. It does give me an "ick"
feeling though as it's very
David Blevins wrote:
Couldn't that be "in EJB and related technologies" ??
Certainly implementing the EJB spec is a constant for the project, so
that description would be adequate. It does give me an "ick" feeling
though as it's very much in the nature of the project to go beyond EJB
and te
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
We could use "Scalable, transactional, and multi-user
secure architecture for the development and deployment
of component-based business applications"
How would that differ from River or WS (various WS-* specs cover
transactions and security)?
They
The OpenJPA project is pleased to announce its 0.9.-7 incubating release.
This release contains bug fixes and new features.
The release can be downloaded from the project web site at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/openjpa/Downloads.
More information can be found in the release-notes
On 4/30/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 25, 2007, at 6:23 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 April 2007 11:55, Patrick Linskey wrote:
>>> * OpenJPA includes software developed by the SERP project
>>> Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved.
>>>
On Apr 25, 2007, at 6:23 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 11:55, Patrick Linskey wrote:
* OpenJPA includes software developed by the SERP project
Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved.
The "All rights reserved." means that it has not been
properl
On 30/04/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is that still true of companies owned by the same entity are counted as one
(e.g., IBM, Lotus and Tivoli would count as a single employer)?
Yup.
- Brett
-
To unsubscribe
David Blevins wrote:
>> The definition of ejb spells out "Scalable, transactional, and
>> multi-user secure" which is summed up by the word 'enterprise'.
>> So maybe something like "creation and maintenance of enterprise
>> application containers and object distribution". Maybe expand
>> that last
David Blevins wrote:
> We could use "Scalable, transactional, and multi-user
> secure architecture for the development and deployment
> of component-based business applications"
How would that differ from River or WS (various WS-* specs cover
transactions and security)?
> Generally, I think it's
Brett Porter wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman asked:
> > What is the diversity of the Committer list and the PMC?
> There are individuals from >= 3 employers in both committers and the PMC.
Is that still true of companies owned by the same entity are counted as one
(e.g., IBM, Lotus and Tivoli would count
10 matches
Mail list logo