Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build 003 incubating

2007-03-04 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 3/5/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Dan, Many thanks for looking this over. For #1 & #3. Can you tell how to go about fixing them? How/where do I create/get those files? The ASF Source Header and Copyright Notice Policy is here: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.

RE: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build 003 incubating

2007-03-04 Thread George Aroush
Hi Dan, Many thanks for looking this over. For #1 & #3. Can you tell how to go about fixing them? How/where do I create/get those files? For #3, those are the same header as used by the Java Lucene 2.0 release. The port from Java to C# caries over the same headers, etc. For #4, I agree. All:

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build 003 incubating

2007-03-04 Thread Daniel Kulp
-1 (non-binding) After a very quick perusal: 1) Missing gpg signatures on the files. 2) No incubator disclaimer anywhere. 3) All the files have the "old style" Apache header. They should have been updated to the new style. The copyright dates in the old headers are obviously not updated

[VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build 003 incubating

2007-03-04 Thread George Aroush
Hi folks, Lucene.Net community has voted to release Lucene.Net 2.0 build 003 incubating. I am emailing you to request your vote for this release. (For those who are not familiar with Lucene.Net, please visit http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ to learn more.) Below are the release details.

Re: [VOTE] Approve the Release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-03-04 Thread Jean T. Anderson
Adam Lally wrote: > The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version > 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to > approve this release. > > Release artifacts: > http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/ > ... I reviewed the uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-src.ta