Houston - I believe we have liftoff!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] podling Vote Thread
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] podling Vote Summary
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 4 binding +1 votes (and 1 nonbinding +1) by mod_ftp to exit the
> incubator as an httpd sub-project.
[EMAIL PROTE
On Feb 15, 2007, at 6:54 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
search for "if applicable"
Using the search available here ( http://www.uspto.gov/main/
trademarks.htm ) I found nothing which looks infringing. There are
a number of wombat trademarks around, but the only one related to
software is m
On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
-1 (NOT binding)
The document still contains remnants of its TEMPLATE origin
search for "TEMPLATE"
Deleted this section, thank you
search for "if applicable"
Using the search available here ( http://www.uspto.gov/main/
trademarks.htm )
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Because everyone always seems to add their /metoo right after the vote
results are released, I'll post a quick status now, and close the vote
at the T+4:12:00:00 mark, a little more than 4 1/2 hours from now ;-)
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
(With the addition of Nick
Because everyone always seems to add their /metoo right after the vote
results are released, I'll post a quick status now, and close the vote
at the T+4:12:00:00 mark, a little more than 4 1/2 hours from now ;-)
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> (With the addition of Nick Kew's late +1) attached is th
On Feb 13, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http://
incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-wombat.html ) has been
recorded and I would like to move forward with the import.
Code grants and CLA's have been recorded from each person
Hi,
From the current month
(http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2007), take a look at
stdcxx, qpid, and nmaven.
Yoav
On 2/15/07, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
what is the board report format. Justin left a remark that we did not follow
the template for Ivy.
Regar
Hi,
what is the board report format. Justin left a remark that we did not follow
the template for Ivy.
Regards,
Antoine
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:45 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
IMO, the IP clearance is the responsibility of the PMC where the
code ends up. That PMC has to follow a process documented on the
incubator.apache.org website, discuss changes to that process on
general@incubator.apache.org, and commit to a
Hi,
Thanks Xavier for the report.
Regards,
Antoine
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:19:43 +0100
Von: "Xavier Hanin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: general@incubator.apache.org
CC:
Betreff: Re: REMINDER: BOARD REPORTS
> On 2/14/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:45 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
None. Why have the Incubator involved at
all if we basically say "Yeah, yeah, if you say so,
it's fine with us."
Historic reasons and efficiency? You could establish an "IP
clearance committee" but that'd be overhead and doesn't sound like
m
On Feb 15, 2007, at 8:15 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:43 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
for IP clearance, i don't see how the IPMC is able to do anything
other than just check the documentation: a pure paper exercise. we
have no choice to trust that the PMC has read, understo
On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:43 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
for IP clearance, i don't see how the IPMC is able to do anything
other than just check the documentation: a pure paper exercise. we
have no choice to trust that the PMC has read, understood and followed
the instructions.
whilst this r
On 2/15/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:02 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> if you don't like the process, propose a patch :-)
>
The sad fact is that there is a clear disconnect between
some of the docs and "normal" practice. This was clear
back with the
+1 to put it into a dormant status.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just took a look...
+1 (binding, IPMC).
On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:04 PM, John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
The voting results so far for the Woden M7 release are:
+1 Deepal Jayasinghe (WSPMC binding)
+1 Davanum Srinivas (WSPMC binding, IPMC binding)
+1 Jeremy Hughes (WSPMC binding)
+1 Paul Fremantle (W
On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:02 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
if you don't like the process, propose a patch :-)
The sad fact is that there is a clear disconnect between
some of the docs and "normal" practice. This was clear
back with the whole CeltixFire fiasco ;)
My point has always been tha
Just one note:
I don't see gpg asc signatures for any of the files on that page. I also
don't see a KEYS file in svn that would list the gpg keys that would be used.
Dan
On Thursday 15 February 2007 13:11, John Kaputin (gmail) wrote:
> If anyone else wants to review the Woden M7 release ca
On 2/14/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
OK, we're almost there ;)
Lokahi, stdcxx, TSIK, WSRP4J, y'all still have a few hours.
I was also hoping to see the Ivy report (originally expected last
month) on http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2007 by now...
Hi,
I'm still no
Hi,
Ah, thanks for the reminder. I was almost done reviewing this release
a couple of das and then got distracted.
+1 to releasing it, and good job in general. I like how Woden's chugging along.
Yoav
On 2/15/07, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The voting results so far for the
If anyone else wants to review the Woden M7 release candidate and vote,
please note that the M7 release files are now available at:
http://people.apache.org/~jkaputin/woden/milestones/1.0M7-incubating/
thanks,
John Kaputin.
On 2/15/07, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The votin
The voting results so far for the Woden M7 release are:
+1 Deepal Jayasinghe (WSPMC binding)
+1 Davanum Srinivas (WSPMC binding, IPMC binding)
+1 Jeremy Hughes (WSPMC binding)
+1 Paul Fremantle (WSPMC binding, IPMC binding)
+1 Lawrence Mandel
+1 Arthur Ryman
+1 Graham Turrell
+1 John Kaputin
So,
On 2/15/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 14, 2007, at 1:02 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 2/14/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 13, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
>>
>> > The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http://
>>
On Feb 14, 2007, at 1:02 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 2/14/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
> The last code grant for the mod_wombat codebase ( http://
> incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-wombat.html ) has been
>
On Feb 14, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
There is no reasonable expectation of log4php satisfying the exit
criteria. log4php has had no code modification in over a year and
minimal activity on the log4php-dev and log4php-user mailing
lists. Repeated attempts have been made to com
On Feb 14, 2007, at 1:02 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
These types of things should require activing
voting, not lazy-consensus. Otherwise the Incubator
is worthless.
not worthless: the incubator acts as a single place where the origins
of external code can be tracked whilst oversight is ex
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 17:58, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > And because naming and shaming works:
> >
> > ...
> > XAP
> > ...
>
> Only projects that are current on their board reports should be allowed to
> release.
Seems to have worked... :o)
Cheers
Niclas
--
On Feb 14, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
The log4net-dev community appears healthy and I believes warrants
graduation from the incubator and has my +1 as mentor and incubator
PMC member.
+1
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe
+1
On 2/15/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 14, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
> There is no reasonable expectation of log4php satisfying the exit
> criteria.
> Here is my +1
+1.
Thanks Curt! Sorting this out is never fun...
- Leo
-
On Feb 14, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
There is no reasonable expectation of log4php satisfying the exit
criteria.
Here is my +1
+1.
Thanks Curt! Sorting this out is never fun...
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Feb 14, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
And because naming and shaming works:
...
XAP
...
Only projects that are current on their board reports should be
allowed to
release.
Now that's a big stick! :-)
- Leo
---
31 matches
Mail list logo
