APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 11/8/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hiram,
I pulled the versions from your personal site and looked at the
tar.gz files. The server started fine and from a user perspective it
looks great.
The LICENSE information seems to be correct. The only nit is that
Hiram,
I pulled the versions from your personal site and looked at the
tar.gz files. The server started fine and from a user perspective it
looks great.
The LICENSE information seems to be correct. The only nit is that
the NOTICE file does not have a .txt on the end like the other files
I'll take a look Hiram...I'm not an Incubator PMC member but I'll
provide my input.
On Nov 8, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Unless I'm lossing email... I think we still need a few more votes
from incubator pmc members to make this release official. Anybody
around that can help check
Unless I'm lossing email... I think we still need a few more votes
from incubator pmc members to make this release official. Anybody
around that can help check this release??
On 10/29/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some last minute NOTICE issues were still present in the 5th relea
Hi Robert,
robert burrell donkin wrote:
...
but see comments by david and david later in this thread. i'm happy
that this is know resolved and hope that OfBiz may contact the
consortium and ask about offering under a different license in future.
Yes, this is something we will probably try to
On 11/7/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/7/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIC the substantive issue is the xsd's without open source licenses
> but IMHO this is a marginal case. the license is missing from the
> LICENSE file.
>
> apache has traditio
On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:40 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 11/7/06, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 5, 2006, at 3:52 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 11/2/06, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I read through the stuff on the 3party.html page you referenced
> I read through the stuff on the 3party.html page you referenced and I
> think if this does become the case there is an easy way we can handle
> it. While it may be a little inconvenient we can remove these files
> and refer to them in locations publicly available via the internet.
> This way we
