+1 (non-binding)
great job guys
On 10/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
if you haven't voted and are interested in voting, please do.
Thanks
geir
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
if you haven't voted and are interested in voting, please do.
Thanks
geir
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Kelvin,
The release includes the license and notice files but I don't see any
file pointing out the licenses of the individual jar files included
in the release.
The notice file is some what ambiguous on what is included under
which license. It refers to the EPL and CPL (both are fine
I agree that if we had had a more formal review of the initial
committers list during the proposal process we would have avoided the
kind of conflicts that arose after the proposal was approved.
I would also agree with some other comments that this sort of policy is
intended as a guideline since
Marshall Schor wrote:
The most popular way to pronounce UIMA is you-eee-muh.
There is a fairly large user community using pre-Apache UIMA. The
potential confusion about which UIMA people may be talking about may be
mitigated somewhat by versioning. The pre-Apache releases are numbered
1.x.
On 10/27/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's contrary to what we were originally told by the mirroring folks,
e.g., Joshua. So we told everyone, as we were told, to use cvs(now
people).a.o. If infra is OK with this, we'll change the release docs to
reflect it.
In the origina
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> IMO, if the IPMC votes to approve the release, it should be slapped in
> www.a.o/dist/incubator/ and hence use the same mirror system as
> everyone else. The mirrors can live with the noise - the IPMC isn't
> approving *that* many releases.
That's contrary to what we w
On 10/27/06, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not being noticed doesn't mean you are doing a bad job :)
so do we need to make it bad, to get attention ? :)
I tried to find some info about adding a mentor, but couldn't find anything
specific, but I guess
just a notification afte
Not being noticed doesn't mean you are doing a bad job :)
I tried to find some info about adding a mentor, but couldn't find anything specific, but I guess
just a notification after to the vote to the general should do it (assuming I get voted as a mentor
that is)
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessen
I don't use Trinidad myself (or JSF for that matter), but since you guys
appeared on my radar last
year I actively monitor all myfaces (related) lists. The lack of attention you
are getting on the
incubator list could also be viewed from a positive side : you are, as a
project, handling
yoursel
On 10/26/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so, i would prefer to see incubator releases stored in a central
subversion repository and a zone managed by the IPMC used to host them
for download. perhaps a small number of select incubator-only mirrors
could be recruited. IMHO this
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi
Congrats to you Martin to be a IPMC member.
So we now can move forward w/ pushing that release out?
Post a vote result and start pushing :)
But I am still wondering about the attention on this.
Is it just a matter of time and the point, that not really everyb
On Oct 25, 2006, at 6:35 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
It doesn't matter whatsoever as long as you are VERY consistently
calling it "Apache Braintree" as you should be doing _anyways_
Would that apply equally to the two names that were more highly
rated by the
JINI community
Hi
Congrats to you Martin to be a IPMC member.
So we now can move forward w/ pushing that release out?
But I am still wondering about the attention on this.
Is it just a matter of time and the point, that not really everybody is
using JSF for web apps ?
Thanks!
Matthias
On 10/27/06, Martin van
Became binding yesterday evening :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I am just wondering if there is anything new from here.
Is the vote of Martin now binding or not ?
If not, I guess we are not allowed to make a release.
If so, that would be a pity, because we all (the Trinidad po
Hi,
I am just wondering if there is anything new from here.
Is the vote of Martin now binding or not ?
If not, I guess we are not allowed to make a release.
If so, that would be a pity, because we all (the Trinidad podling)
like to go the next step and
if I read the Harmony releated emails right
On 10/27/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And more generally: you don't need to ask permission to join the
development of any Apache project. Your help is welcome.
Start by reading the general guidelines at
http://www.apache.org/dev/contributors.html
Simply join the mailing list(s)
And more generally: you don't need to ask permission to join the
development of any Apache project. Your help is welcome.
Start by reading the general guidelines at
http://www.apache.org/dev/contributors.html
Simply join the mailing list(s) for the project, start participating
in the discussion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 (incubator PMC)
- --
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comm
lucene4c recently went dormant. You might be interested in Lucy:
http://lucene.apache.org/lucy/
-Original Message-
From: sachin sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 1:08 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Request to join in development of lucene4c
H
On 10/27/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could we start by publishing to our own svn repository ?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/repo ?
-1
we have enough issues with robots using excessive bandwidth whilst
crawling our repository already
any repository
Henri Yandell wrote:
> On 10/26/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> With the hardware issues of people.apache.org lately its been a trying
>> week working on stuff in the incubator - maven builds have been
>> failing most of the week. We've also lost a few releases it seems
>> (XBean
Hi All,
I also want to join the development team of lucene4c. Please tell me the
way to get the same.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Sachin Sharma
-
Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com. Check it out.
On 10/26/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With the hardware issues of people.apache.org lately its been a trying
week working on stuff in the incubator - maven builds have been
failing most of the week. We've also lost a few releases it seems
(XBean 2.7, ServiceMix 3.0 maybe others t
24 matches
Mail list logo
