On 9/26/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[X] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason:
+1 (non binding)
-Yonik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
[X] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason:
Otis
- Original Message
From: Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 7:17:37 PM
Subject: [Vote] accept UIMA as a
The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Milestone 6). The proposal recieved six +1 votes,
including three from WS PMC members. There were no -1 or 0 votes. The
proposal can be seen at [1].
The six +1 votes were from:
Eran Chinthaka (WS PMC)
Ar
issues addressed in this release:
1. updated proposal included
2. The first paragraph explains it to a layperson
3. OASIS issue addressed
[ ] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason:
8<---Proposal--8<--
On 9/25/06, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The OFBiz podling (PPMC and community) has reached a consensus
internally approving the 4.0.0 TS3 test snapshot release. We are now
requesting a vote for review and approval from the general Incubator
group and the Incubator PMC.
gpg looks g
On 9/25/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/25/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/NOTICE
i was going to use the notice as an example of good practice until i
noted that it lacked the header which is now r
On 9/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Trinidad community voted on and approved to release the the maven2
plugins as a milestone1 release. These plugins are required for the maven2
build of the "core" code of the Trinidad Podling. To fulfill the incubator
guides, we like t
On 9/26/06, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 25, 2006, at 10:56 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> (FYI a source distribution is required but i'm assume that you know
> how to svn export)
Do you mean a separate source distribution is needed?
many would argue that for open sour
Jim Hurley wrote:
> Don't know if this is acceptable to send to this list -- so my
> apologies if I'm stepping in it here :-obut I know some people
> on the list may not be that familiar with Jini and so I thought
> I'd recommend a recent series of podcasts that the JavaPosse
> is doing on Jini
+1 (binding).
-- dims
On 9/26/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would it be possible for an incubator PMC member to vote on this release ?
We still miss one +1,
Thanks,
Guillaume Nodet
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> The ServiceMix community voted on and approved to release
> the 3.0-in
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
It also seems that Felix has forked Tomcat's servlet code - which is okay:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/felix/trunk/javax.servlet/src/main/java/javax/servlet/GenericServlet.java
However, the copyright years have been altered from the original file
- re
Richard S. Hall wrote:
>
>> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>>
>>> It also seems that Felix has forked Tomcat's servlet code - which is
>>> okay:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/felix/trunk/javax.servlet/src/main/java/javax/servlet/GenericServlet.java
>>>
>>>
>>> However, the copyrigh
Don't know if this is acceptable to send to this list -- so my
apologies if I'm stepping in it here :-obut I know some people
on the list may not be that familiar with Jini and so I thought
I'd recommend a recent series of podcasts that the JavaPosse
is doing on Jini (and the computecycles.dev
Thanks Geir.
It's certainly a viable alternative plan, but we're trying to match
up with
the history and culture we've created in the Jini Community of open
involvement, so it seems like goodness to engage more broadly and
give people a say.
We've had a number of good names submitted -- but I
On Sep 25, 2006, at 10:56 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
(FYI a source distribution is required but i'm assume that you know
how to svn export)
Do you mean a separate source distribution is needed?
In the past, as with this test snapshot, we have just included the
source and binary in th
Would it be possible for an incubator PMC member to vote on this release ?
We still miss one +1,
Thanks,
Guillaume Nodet
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> The ServiceMix community voted on and approved to release
> the 3.0-incubating version [1]. Pursuant to the Releases section of
> the Incubation Poli
The Trinidad community voted on and approved to release the the maven2
plugins as a milestone1 release. These plugins are required for the maven2
build of the "core" code of the Trinidad Podling. To fulfill the incubator
guides, we like to ask you guys, the Incubator PMC, for a permission to relea
17 matches
Mail list logo
