On 4/30/06, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Craig McClanahan wrote:
> David M Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >OK, so Cliff says we need to have copyright notices on all files
> >before we can release 2.2 and that we should make the release on
> >Apache infrastructure this time
Craig McClanahan wrote:
> David M Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >OK, so Cliff says we need to have copyright notices on all files
> >before we can release 2.2 and that we should make the release on
> >Apache infrastructure this time.
> >
> >He also mentioned that somebody has a script th
On 4/29/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 29 April 2006 02:57, Ben van Klinken wrote:
> For historical reasons, CLucene is dual licensed as Apache 2.0 license
> or LGPL. As I understand it, the apache license is currently is not
> compatible with GPL projects and therefore
